Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal: A systematic review and meta-analysis of indications and outcomes.
van der Horst, S F B; Martens, E S L; den Exter, P L; Bos, M H A; van Mens, T E; Huisman, M V; Klok, F A.
Affiliation
  • van der Horst SFB; Department of Medicine - Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: s.f.b.van_der_horst@lumc.nl.
  • Martens ESL; Department of Medicine - Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • den Exter PL; Department of Medicine - Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Bos MHA; Department of Medicine - Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van Mens TE; Department of Medicine - Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Huisman MV; Department of Medicine - Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Klok FA; Department of Medicine - Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Thromb Res ; 228: 21-32, 2023 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37267671
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Idarucizumab has been approved to reverse the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran. However, there is little knowledge of the effectiveness and safety of idarucizumab in daily practice.

AIMS:

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the use, effectiveness and outcomes of idarucizumab.

METHODS:

A systematic literature search was performed up to September 8th 2022. Original studies including patients prescribed idarucizumab, evaluating prescription indications, prescription appropriateness, haemostatic efficacy and/or the occurrence of adverse events were eligible. Case-reports and studies performed in patients ≤18 years or in healthy volunteers were excluded. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Pooled estimates were calculated using the random-effects model, after Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation.

RESULTS:

Thirty studies comprising 3602 patients were included. Idarucizumab was prescribed for bleeding (63.1 %, 95%CI 57.0 %-69.0 %), invasive procedures (30.5 %, 95%CI 24.1 %-37.2 %), to enable thrombolysis (range 2.0 %-27.3 %), dabigatran intoxication without bleeding (range 3.6 %-7.0 %) or unspecified reasons (range 0.4 %-18.8 %). Overall, 2.8 % (95%CI 0.5 %-6.2 %) of prescription indications were reported to be inappropriate upon post-hoc evaluation. Hemostatic effectiveness was achieved in 77.7 % (95%CI 66.7 %-87.2 %) and peri-procedural haemostasis was normal in 98.5 % (95%CI 86.6 %-100 %) of patients. The pooled incidences of all-cause mortality and thromboembolic events at any follow-up duration were 13.6 % (95%CI 9.6 %-17.9 %) and 2.0 % (95%CI 0.8 %-3.4 %), respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Idarucizumab was mainly prescribed in the setting of bleeding. The reported hemostatic effectiveness was good, especially perioperatively, and the incidence of thromboembolic events was low. Patients with dabigatran-associated bleeding or requiring an urgent procedure nonetheless face a high mortality risk.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Thromboembolism / Hemostatics Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Thromb Res Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Thromboembolism / Hemostatics Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Thromb Res Year: 2023 Document type: Article