Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Ability of First Aid Providers to Recognize Anaphylaxis: A Scoping Review.
Meyran, Daniel; Cassan, Pascal; Nemeth, Michael; Singletary, Eunice; Raitt, James; Djarv, Therese; Carlson, Jestin N.
Affiliation
  • Meyran D; Healthcare, French Red Cross, Paris, FRA.
  • Cassan P; Prehospital Emergency Care, Bataillon De Marins Pompiers De Marseille, Marseille, FRA.
  • Nemeth M; Prehospital Emergency Care, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) Global Reference First Aid Reference Center, French Red Cross, Paris, FRA.
  • Singletary E; Prehospital Care, International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, Toronto, CAN.
  • Raitt J; Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
  • Djarv T; Emergency Medicine, Thames Valley Air Ambulance, Oxford, GBR.
  • Carlson JN; Emergency Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, SWE.
Cureus ; 15(7): e41547, 2023 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37554608
ABSTRACT
Early recognition of anaphylaxis is critical to early treatment and often occurs in the first aid setting. However, the ability of first aid providers to recognize anaphylaxis is unknown. We sought to examine the evidence regarding first aid providers' ability to recognize anaphylaxis. Our scoping review was performed as part of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) continuous evidence evaluation processes to update the 2020 ILCOR Consensus on Science with Treatment Recommendations. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and the gray literature from 2010 to September 2022. The population included adults and children experiencing anaphylaxis with a description of any specific symptom to a first aid provider. Recognition of anaphylaxis was the primary outcome. Two investigators (DM and PC) reviewed abstracts and extracted and assessed the data. Discrepancies between the reviewers were resolved by discussion and consensus with the ILCOR First Aid Task Force. Out of 957 hits, 17 studies met inclusion criteria one review and meta-analysis, two experimental studies, and 14 observational studies. We did not identify any studies that directly addressed our PICOST (Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design, and Timeframe) as none were performed in the first aid setting. Articles included individuals who may be first aid providers as patients and parents (n=5), teachers, students or school staff (n=8), caregivers and patients (n= 2) or nannies (n=1). All included studies were conducted in high-income countries. Our scoping review found that signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis were not specific and did not allow for easy identification by the first aid provider. Studies focused on education (n=10) and protocols (n=2) and found that both could have a positive impact on anaphylaxis recognition and management. While we did not identify any clinical studies that directly addressed the ability of first aid providers to identify anaphylaxis, future studies examining education methods and action plans may help improve the identification of anaphylaxis by first aid providers.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Cureus Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Cureus Year: 2023 Document type: Article