Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gastric electrical stimulation is safe during pregnancy and delivery: Results from a French cohort.
Soliman, Heithem; Schalla, Martha A; Coffin, Benoît; Gourcerol, Guillaume.
Affiliation
  • Soliman H; Service d'Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Louis Mourier, DMU ESPRIT-GHU AP-HP-Nord, Colombes, France.
  • Schalla MA; Department of Physiology, Université de Rouen Normandie, INSERM, ADEN UMR1073, "Nutrition, Inflammation and Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis", CHU Rouen, Rouen, France.
  • Coffin B; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, HELIOS Kliniken GmbH, Rottweil, Germany.
  • Gourcerol G; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 35(10): e14657, 2023 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37574861
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is an effective therapy in medically refractory chronic nausea and vomiting. GES is assumed to be a contraindication for pregnancy. We examined the safety of GES during pregnancy and its clinical impact on vomiting symptoms.

METHODS:

A retrospective study was performed in two tertiary centers including all female patients of childbearing age implanted with GES. Patients without pregnancy while on GES were asked about their desire and concerns about pregnancy. Patients who were pregnant while on GES therapy were interviewed about the course of the pregnancy and labor, as well as the health of the children. KEY

RESULTS:

Among 91 patients implanted at childbearing age, 54 patients without pregnancy answered the questionnaire. Nine patients (16.7%) reported a desire for pregnancy and five patients (7.4%) reported worries about the safety of GES during pregnancy. Sixteen pregnancies were reported in 10 patients. All pregnancies ended in a live birth with premature birth in 12 pregnancies (75.0%). No health concern was currently noted in these children. No severe GES-related complications occurred during pregnancy with only pain at the implantation site reported during 3 pregnancies (18.8%). The severity and frequency of nausea and vomiting significantly increased during the first trimester (p = 0.04 and p = 0.005, respectively) and decreased after the delivery, becoming lower than before the pregnancy (p = 0.044 and p = 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSION & INFERENCES Patients are concerned regarding pregnancy while being treated with GES. No serious maternal or fetal complications related to GES were noted in our cohort.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Electric Stimulation Therapy / Gastroparesis Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Electric Stimulation Therapy / Gastroparesis Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: