Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is Periodontal and Peri- Implant Disease Associated with Fixed Partial Denture Use? A 25-year Prospective Case Series.
Cambiaghi, L; de Azevedo-Silva, L J; Campos Costa, M S; da Silva Costa, S M; de Almeida, A L P F.
Affiliation
  • Cambiaghi L; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru - SP, Brazil.
  • de Azevedo-Silva LJ; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru - SP, Brazil.
  • Campos Costa MS; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru - SP, Brazil.
  • da Silva Costa SM; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru - SP, Brazil.
  • de Almeida ALPF; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru - SP, Brazil.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent ; 32(1): 56-64, 2024 Feb 29.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37721553
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The association of the periodontium with the fixed prosthesis is the basis of prosthetic rehabilitation. This prospective case series aimed to evaluate periodontal health through the relation between periodontal/peri-implant disease progression and the use of fixed partial dentures (FPDs).

METHODS:

Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival index (GI), and plaque index (PI) on either teeth or implants were evaluated at up to 25-year follow-up and compared with the baseline. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier test (p⟨0.05).

RESULTS:

The prospective evaluation showed that the patients maintained adequate periodontal health. Failure (severe periodontal stages) occurred in 12.5% of patients. The survival rate for 107 teeth/implants was 80.48%. The comparisons for clinical parameters revealed no statistically significant difference (p⟩ 0.05). At T1, the measurements for anterior and posterior regions, respectively, were PD =2.7mm and 3.1mm; CAL= 3.3mm and 3.6mm; GI=0.5 (both regions); and PI=0.79 and 0.62. Periodontal/peri-implant disease progression did not relate to the use of prostheses.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with more frequent follow-up appointments and lower GI and PI showed periodontal health for longer periods. Patients with different oral hygiene levels present different periodontal disease progression. Periodic hygiene control and motivation are vital factors for extensive oral rehabilitation success.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Periodontal Diseases / Dental Implants / Peri-Implantitis Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Periodontal Diseases / Dental Implants / Peri-Implantitis Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: