Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound guided core needle biopsy for soft tissue tumors: Accuracy and applicability.
Zhang, Ying-Lun; Wu, Meng-Jie; Hu, Yu; Ma, Qian; Wei, Zong-Kai; Yao, Qi-Yu; Huang, Yu-Min; Li, Ao.
Affiliation
  • Zhang YL; Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Wu MJ; Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Hu Y; Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Ma Q; Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Wei ZK; Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Yao QY; Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Huang YM; Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. Electronic address: 80267534@qq.com.
  • Li A; Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. Electronic address: cqh2liao@163.com.
Eur J Radiol ; 168: 111114, 2023 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37778147
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guided core needle biopsy (CNB) in diagnosing soft tissue tumors (STTs) and to identify the conventional ultrasonography (US) features of STTs that are recommended for CEUS-guided CNB. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A retrospective study was conducted on 123 patients with surgically confirmed STTs. Before surgeries, all subjects underwent CNB under the guidance of US or CEUS. The histopathological results of surgical specimens were considered as the gold standards. A successful biopsy diagnosis was defined as the pathological subtypes obtained by biopsy consistent with the gold standard. The diagnostic yields were compared between the US and CEUS groups, and the diagnostic yields based on various conventional US features of STTs were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS:

Sixty-seven cases underwent US-guided CNB and fifty-six cases underwent CEUS-guided CNB. The clinical, biopsy, and conventional US characteristics revealed no significant difference between the two groups. The diagnostic yield of the CEUS group was statistically higher than that of the US group (p = 0.011). In the CEUS group, more STTs with the anechoic areas were identified after CEUS examination (p = 0.031). Furthermore, the diagnostic yields based on the conventional US features of STTs, including deep fascia layer (p = 0.010), a maximum diameter ≥5 cm (p = 0.037), rough margin (p = 0.016), heterogeneous echotexture (p = 0.017), and absence of anechoic area (p = 0.013), were significantly different between the two groups, and the CEUS group exhibited higher diagnostic yields.

CONCLUSION:

CEUS-guided CNB was found to be an efficient method for STTs diagnosis. It is particularly recommended for STTs with the following conventional US features, including location in deep fascia layer, a maximum diameter ≥5 cm, rough margin, heterogeneous echotexture, or absence of anechoic area.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Soft Tissue Neoplasms / Image-Guided Biopsy Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Radiol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Soft Tissue Neoplasms / Image-Guided Biopsy Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Radiol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: