Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reactive Case Detection and Treatment and Reactive Drug Administration for Reducing Malaria Transmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Steinhardt, Laura C; Kc, Achyut; Tiffany, Amanda; Quincer, Elizabeth M; Loerinc, Leah; Laramee, Nicolas; Large, Amy; Lindblade, Kim A.
Affiliation
  • Steinhardt LC; Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Kc A; Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Tiffany A; Global Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Quincer EM; Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Loerinc L; Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Laramee N; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Large A; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Lindblade KA; Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 110(4_Suppl): 82-93, 2024 Apr 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38118166
ABSTRACT
Many countries pursuing malaria elimination implement "reactive" strategies targeting household members and neighbors of index cases to reduce transmission. These strategies include reactive case detection and treatment (RACDT; testing and treating those positive) and reactive drug administration (RDA; providing antimalarials without testing). We conducted systematic reviews of RACDT and RDA to assess their effect on reducing malaria transmission and gathered evidence about key contextual factors important to their implementation. Two reviewers screened titles/abstracts and full-text records using defined criteria (Patient = those in malaria-endemic/receptive areas; Intervention = RACDT or RDA; Comparison = standard of care; Outcome = malaria incidence/prevalence) and abstracted data for meta-analyses. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach was used to rate certainty of evidence (CoE) for each outcome. Of 1,460 records screened, reviewers identified five RACDT studies (three cluster-randomized controlled trials [cRCTs] and two nonrandomized studies [NRS]) and seven RDA studies (six cRCTs and one NRS); three cRCTs comparing RDA to RACDT were included in both reviews. Compared with RDA, RACDT was associated with nonsignificantly higher parasite prevalence (odds ratio [OR] = 1.85; 95% CI 0.96-3.57; one study) and malaria incidence (rate ratio [RR] = 1.30; 95% CI 0.94-1.79; three studies), both very low CoE. Compared with control or RACDT, RDA was associated with non-significantly lower parasite incidence (RR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.36-1.47; 2 studies, moderate CoE), prevalence (OR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.52-1.17; 4 studies, low CoE), and malaria incidence (RR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.82-1.05; six studies, moderate CoE). Evidence for reactive strategies' impact on malaria transmission is limited, especially for RACDT, but suggests RDA might be more effective.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: