Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exchange of a Tracheal Tube and Supraglottic Airway Device: Evaluation of Different Techniques in Three Simulated Airway Scenarios (TUBE Study)-A Prospective, Randomised Controlled Study.
Kriege, Marc; Demare, Tim; Ruemmler, Robert; Schmidtmann, Irene; Wojciechowski, Janosh; Busch, Anneke; Ott, Thomas.
Affiliation
  • Kriege M; Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • Demare T; Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • Ruemmler R; Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • Schmidtmann I; Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • Wojciechowski J; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Asklepios Paulinen Hospital Wiesbaden, 65197 Wiesbaden, Germany.
  • Busch A; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Asklepios Paulinen Hospital Wiesbaden, 65197 Wiesbaden, Germany.
  • Ott T; Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
J Clin Med ; 13(1)2023 Dec 19.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38202022
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The swapping of a supraglottic airway device or a tracheal tube in anaesthetised adult patients is a challenging procedure because potential complications through hypoxemia and loss of airway may occur, with life-threatening implications. This study aims to evaluate which airway technique offers the highest success rate concerning a secure airway in established supraglottic airway and tracheal tube airway exchange scenarios.

METHODS:

After ethical approval, anaesthesiologists were randomised 11 into simulated scenarios an LTS group (malpositioned laryngeal tube) and a Cuff group (relevant cuff leakage of a placed tracheal tube). After that, both groups completed a common scenario consisting of a partially obstructed tracheal tube lumen in a fixed prone position with a Mayfield clamp. The primary endpoint was a successful tracheal airway exchange within ten minutes after the start of the scenario and before severe hypoxemia (SpO2 < 80%) arose. Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of factors influencing success after 10 min.

RESULTS:

In total, 60 anaesthesiologists (LTS group n = 30; Cuff group n = 30) with a median experience of 7 years (IQR 4-11) were observed. Within 10 min, a malpositioned laryngeal tube was successfully exchanged by 27/30 (90%) participants, compared to the exchange of a tracheal tube with a relevant cuff leakage by 29/30 (97%; p > 0.05). An airway exchange in an obstructed tube scenario occurred in 22/59 (37%). Loss of airway maintenance showed an obvious association with failure in the common scenario (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION:

The results of this simulation-based study reflect that the exchange of an existing but insufficient airway device in clinical practice is a high-risk procedure. Especially in a fixed prone position, the deliberate evaluation of the existing airway patency and well-conceived airway management in the case of the accidental loss of the airway or obstructed airway access are crucial.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Ethics Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Ethics Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: