Comprehensive benchmark of differential transcript usage analysis for static and dynamic conditions.

ABSTRACT

RNA sequencing offers unique insights into transcriptome diversity, and a plethora of tools have been developed to analyze alternative splicing. One important task is to detect changes in the relative transcript abundance in differential transcript usage (DTU) analysis. The choice of the right analysis tool is non-trivial and depends on experimental factors such as the availability of single- or paired-end and bulk or single-cell data. To help users select the most promising tool for their task, we performed a comprehensive benchmark of DTU detection tools. We cover a wide array of experimental settings, using simulated bulk and single-cell RNA-seq data as well as real transcriptomics datasets, including time-series data. Our results suggest that DEXSeq, edgeR, and LimmaDS are better choices for paired-end data, while DSGseq and DEXSeq can be used for single-end data. In single-cell simulation settings, we showed that satuRn performs better than DTUrtle. In addition, we showed that Spycone is optimal for time series DTU/IS analysis based on the evidence provided using GO terms enrichment analysis.