Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Time in Range, Time in Tight Range, and Average Glucose Relationships Are Modulated by Glycemic Variability: Identification of a Glucose Distribution Model Connecting Glycemic Parameters Using Real-World Data.
Xu, Yongjin; Dunn, Timothy C; Bergenstal, Richard M; Cheng, Alan; Dabiri, Yaghoub; Ajjan, Ramzi A.
Affiliation
  • Xu Y; Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, California, USA.
  • Dunn TC; Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, California, USA.
  • Bergenstal RM; International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Cheng A; Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, California, USA.
  • Dabiri Y; Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, California, USA.
  • Ajjan RA; The LIGHT Laboratories, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 26(7): 467-477, 2024 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38315505
ABSTRACT

Background:

Time in range (TIR), time in tight range (TITR), and average glucose (AG) are used to adjust glycemic therapies in diabetes. However, TIR/TITR and AG can show a disconnect, which may create management difficulties. We aimed to understand the factors influencing the relationships between these glycemic markers. Materials and

Methods:

Real-world glucose data were collected from self-identified diabetes type 1 and type 2 diabetes (T1D and T2D) individuals using flash continuous glucose monitoring (FCGM). The effects of glycemic variability, assessed as glucose coefficient of variation (CV), on the relationship between AG and TIR/TITR were investigated together with the best-fit glucose distribution model that addresses these relationships.

Results:

Of 29,164 FCGM users (16,367 T1D, 11,061 T2D, and 1736 others), 38,259 glucose readings/individual were available. Comparing low and high CV tertiles, TIR at AG of 150 mg/dL varied from 80% ± 5.6% to 62% ± 6.8%, respectively (P < 0.001), while TITR at AG of 130 mg/dL varied from 65% ± 7.5% to 49% ± 7.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). In contrast, higher CV was associated with increased TIR and TITR at AG levels outside the upper limit of these ranges. Gamma distribution was superior to six other models at explaining AG and TIR/TITR interactions and demonstrated nonlinear interplay between these metrics.

Conclusions:

The gamma model accurately predicts interactions between CGM-derived glycemic metrics and reveals that glycemic variability can significantly influence the relationship between AG and TIR with opposing effects according to AG levels. Our findings potentially help with clinical diabetes management, particularly when AG and TIR appear mismatched.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Glucose / Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Glucose / Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: