Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Presurgical computed tomography-guided localization of lung ground glass nodules: comparing hook-wire and indocyanine green.
Han, Rui; Wang, Long-Fei; Teng, Fei; Lin, Jia; Xian, Yu-Tao; Lu, Yun; Wu, An-Le.
Affiliation
  • Han R; Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Wang LF; Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Teng F; Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Lin J; Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Xian YT; Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Lu Y; Department of Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China. qq15205210982@163.com.
  • Wu AL; Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China. wuane123@sina.com.
World J Surg Oncol ; 22(1): 51, 2024 Feb 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38336734
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Presurgical computed tomography (CT)-guided localization is frequently employed to reduce the thoracotomy conversion rate, while increasing the rate of successful sublobar resection of ground glass nodules (GGNs) via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). In this study, we compared the clinical efficacies of presurgical CT-guided hook-wire and indocyanine green (IG)-based localization of GGNs.

METHODS:

Between January 2018 and December 2021, we recruited 86 patients who underwent CT-guided hook-wire or IG-based GGN localization before VATS resection in our hospital, and compared the clinical efficiency and safety of both techniques.

RESULTS:

A total of 38 patients with 39 GGNs were included in the hook-wire group, whereas 48 patients with 50 GGNs were included in the IG group. There were no significant disparities in the baseline data between the two groups of patients. According to our investigation, the technical success rates of CT-based hook-wire- and IG-based localization procedures were 97.4% and 100%, respectively (P = 1.000). Moreover, the significantly longer localization duration (15.3 ± 6.3 min vs. 11.2 ± 5.3 min, P = 0.002) and higher visual analog scale (4.5 ± 0.6 vs. 3.0 ± 0.5, P = 0.001) were observed in the hook-wire patients, than in the IG patients. Occurrence of pneumothorax was significantly higher in hook-wire patients (27.3% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.048). Lung hemorrhage seemed higher in hook-wire patients (28.9% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.057) but did not reach statistical significance. Lastly, the technical success rates of VATS sublobar resection were 97.4% and 100% in hook-wire and IG patients, respectively (P = 1.000).

CONCLUSIONS:

Both hook-wire- and IG-based localization methods can effectively identified GGNs before VATS resection. Furthermore, IG-based localization resulted in fewer complications, lower pain scores, and a shorter duration of localization.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Solitary Pulmonary Nodule / Multiple Pulmonary Nodules / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: World J Surg Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Solitary Pulmonary Nodule / Multiple Pulmonary Nodules / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: World J Surg Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: