Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Examining neoadjuvant treatment candidates in resectable pancreatic cancer based on tumor-vessel interactions and CA 19-9 levels: a retrospective cohort study.
Jung, Hye-Sol; Han, Youngmin; Yun, Won-Gun; Cho, Young Jae; Lee, Mirang; Lee, Dong Ho; Kwon, Wooil; Jang, Jin-Young.
Affiliation
  • Jung HS; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute.
  • Han Y; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute.
  • Yun WG; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute.
  • Cho YJ; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute.
  • Lee M; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute.
  • Lee DH; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kwon W; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute.
  • Jang JY; Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute.
Int J Surg ; 110(5): 2883-2893, 2024 May 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38376856
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The applicability of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has arisen, however, high-level evidence is lacking. This study aimed to explore patient subgroups with high-risk resectable PDAC for selecting candidates who may benefit from NAT.

METHODS:

The 1132 patients with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with resectable PDAC without contact of major vessels (R-no contact) ( n =651), with contact of portal vein or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) ≤180° (R-contact) ( n =306), and borderline resectable PDAC without arterial involvement (BR-V) ( n =175) were analyzed.

RESULTS:

The mean age was 64.3±9.8 years, and 647 patients (57.2%) were male. The median follow-up was 26 months in the entire cohort. Patients with resectable PDAC without vascular contact had the most improved overall survival (OS) (median; 31.5 months). OS did not significantly differ between NAT and upfront surgery in the entire resectable PDAC cohort. However, in R-contact group, NAT showed significantly improved OS compared to upfront surgery (33 vs. 23 months). Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was showed a better OS than gemcitabine-based regimens in patients who underwent NAT (34 vs. 24 months). NAT was associated with a better survival in the patients with CA 19-9 level ≥150 U/ml, only when the tumor has PV/SMV contact in resectable disease (40 vs. 19 months, P =0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

NAT can be considered as an effective treatment in patients with resectable PDAC, particularly when the tumor is in contact with PV/SMV and CA 19-9 ≥150 U/ml.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatic Neoplasms / CA-19-9 Antigen / Neoadjuvant Therapy / Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Int J Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatic Neoplasms / CA-19-9 Antigen / Neoadjuvant Therapy / Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Int J Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article
...