Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Glycemic variability assessed using continuous glucose monitoring in individuals without diabetes and associations with cardiometabolic risk markers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hjort, Anna; Iggman, David; Rosqvist, Fredrik.
Affiliation
  • Hjort A; Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Division of Food and Nutrition Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 10, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden. Electronic address: anna.hjort@chalmers.se.
  • Iggman D; Center for Clinical Research Dalarna, Uppsala University, Nissers väg 3, 79182 Falun, Sweden; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, BMC, Box 564, 75122 Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: David.iggman@regiondalarna.se.
  • Rosqvist F; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, BMC, Box 564, 75122 Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: Fredrik.rosqvist@pubcare.uu.se.
Clin Nutr ; 43(4): 915-925, 2024 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38401227
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND &

AIMS:

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides data on short-term glycemic variability (GV). GV is associated with adverse outcomes in individuals with diabetes. Whether GV is associated with cardiometabolic risk in individuals without diabetes is unclear. We systematically reviewed the literature to assess whether GV is associated with cardiometabolic risk markers or outcomes in individuals without diabetes.

METHODS:

Searches were performed in PubMed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane from inception through April 2022. Two researchers were involved in study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. Studies evaluating GV using CGM for ≥24 h were included. Studies in populations with acute and/or critical illness were excluded. Both narrative synthesis and meta-analyzes were performed, depending on outcome.

RESULTS:

Seventy-one studies were included; the majority were cross-sectional. Multiple measures of GV are higher in individuals with compared to without prediabetes and GV appears to be inversely associated with beta cell function. In contrast, GV is not clearly associated with insulin sensitivity, fatty liver disease, adiposity, blood lipids, blood pressure or oxidative stress. However, GV may be positively associated with the degree of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events in individuals with coronary disease.

CONCLUSION:

GV is elevated in prediabetes, potentially related to beta cell dysfunction, but less clearly associated with obesity or traditional risk factors. GV is associated with coronary atherosclerosis development and may predict cardiovascular events and type 2 diabetes. Prospective studies are warranted, investigating the predictive power of GV in relation to incident disease. GV may be an important risk measure also in individuals without diabetes.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prediabetic State / Cardiovascular Diseases / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Nutr / Clin. nutr. (Edinb.) / Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prediabetic State / Cardiovascular Diseases / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Nutr / Clin. nutr. (Edinb.) / Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: