Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perceived and actual value of Student-led Objective Structured Clinical Examinations.
Stretton, Brandon; Montagu, Adam; Kunnel, Aline; Louise, Jenni; Behrendt, Nathan; Kovoor, Joshua; Bacchi, Stephen; Thomas, Josephine; Davies, Ellen.
Affiliation
  • Stretton B; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Montagu A; Adelaide Health Simulation, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Kunnel A; Biostatistics Unit, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Louise J; Biostatistics Unit, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Behrendt N; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Kovoor J; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Bacchi S; Ballarat Base Hospital, Grampians Health Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
  • Thomas J; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Davies E; Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Clin Teach ; 21(4): e13754, 2024 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429878
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Student-led Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) provide formative learning opportunities prior to Faculty-led OSCEs. It is important to undertake quality assurance measurements of peer-led assessments because, if they are found to be unreliable and invalid, they may have detrimental impacts. The objectives of this study were to explore and evaluate Student-led OSCEs hosted by fifth-year medical students.

METHODS:

Student-led OSCE results were analysed to examine reliability (Cronbach's alpha). The relationship between Student-led and Faculty-led OSCEs was evaluated using linear regression. Qualitative data were acquired by survey and semi-structured interviews and were analysed using an inductive content analysis approach.

RESULTS:

In total, 85 (94%) of 91 eligible students consented to study participation. Student-led OSCEs had a low-moderate reliability [Cronbach alpha = 0.47 (primary care) and 0.61 (human reproduction/paediatrics) (HRH)]. A statistically significant, positive relationship between Student-led and Faculty-led OSCE results was observed. Faculty-led OSCE grades increased by 0.49 (95% CI 0.18, 0.80) to 1.09 (95% CI 0.67, 1.52), for each percentage increase in Student-led OSCE result. Student-led OSCE participants highly valued the authentic peer-assessed experience. Reported benefits included a reduction of perceived stress and anxiety prior to Faculty-led OSCEs, recognition of learning gaps, contribution to overall clinical competency and facilitation of collaboration between peers.

DISCUSSION:

Student-led OSCEs are moderately reliable and can predict Faculty-led OSCE performance. This form of near-peer assessment encourages the metacognitive process of reflective practice and can be effectively implemented to direct further study. Faculties should collaborate with their student bodies to facilitate Student-led OSCEs and offer assistance to improve the quality, and benefits, of these endeavours.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Medical / Clinical Competence / Educational Measurement Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Clin Teach Journal subject: EDUCACAO Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Medical / Clinical Competence / Educational Measurement Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Clin Teach Journal subject: EDUCACAO Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: