Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An Evaluation of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patient's Quality of life Following Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty.
Najafi, Arezu; Ala, Moin; Amali, Amin; Hivechi, Nafiseh; Heidari, Reihaneh; Mokary, Yousef.
Affiliation
  • Najafi A; Occupational Sleep Research Center, Baharloo Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Ala M; School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
  • Amali A; Occupational Sleep Research Center, Baharloo Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Hivechi N; Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Heidari R; School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
  • Mokary Y; Occupational Sleep Research Center, Baharloo Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 76(1): 753-757, 2024 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38440610
ABSTRACT

Aims:

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by episodic sleep state-dependent upper airway collapse. OSA can markedly decrease quality of life (QoL) and productivity. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) has been used as an effective treatment for OSA. Recently, uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) treatment has emerged as effective management among patients with OSA, especially non-adherent ones to conventional therapies such as CPAP. Our aim was to determine whether CPAP and UPPP treatment could improve the quality of life in patients with moderate OSA.

Design:

Prospective.

Setting:

Patients with moderate OSA, confirmed by polysomnography from March 2019 to March 2020, participated. CPAP and UPPP treatments were considered for patients according to their preferences. The Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index (SAQLI) questionnaire before and after treatment was completed.

Methods:

Change in their QoL was compared between the CPAP group and UPPP treatment. In addition, QoL was compared between these groups and patients who did not receive any of these treatment methods.

Results:

Seventy-eight patients were included in treatment groups, 40 using CPAP and 38 undergoing UPPP treatment. Furthermore, 10 patients who did not receive treatment were considered the control. Both methods of treatment significantly (p < 0.001) improved QoL, but UPPP treatment was superior (p = 0.042) to CPAP. There was a poor correlation between post-treatment BMI (0.037), Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) (0.096), age (0.022), and post-treatment SAQLI score.

Conclusion:

Based on these results, CPAP and UPPP treatment can improve QoL. UPPP treatment could be considered an effective arm of OSA management among the study population.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: