Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Body size and three estimates of skeletal age: Relationships with strength and motor performance among male soccer players 9-12 and 13-16 years.
Malina, Robert M; Freitas, Duarte; Skrzypczak, Mateusz; Konarski, Jan M.
Affiliation
  • Malina RM; Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
  • Freitas D; School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
  • Skrzypczak M; Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of Madeira, Funchal, Portugal.
  • Konarski JM; Centre of Research, Education, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Am J Hum Biol ; 36(6): e24044, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38441402
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To estimate the associations between height, weight, and three estimates of skeletal age (SA) and the strength and motor performance of male soccer players in two chronological age (CA) groups, 9-12 (n = 60) and 13-16 (n = 52) years.

METHODS:

Height, weight, strength (grip), speed (5 m, 20 m sprints), acceleration (time at crossing 10 m in 20 m sprint), agility (figure-of-eight run), power (vertical jump), and endurance (intermittent shuttle run) were measured. SA was assessed with the TW2 RUS, TW3 RUS, and Fels methods; each SA was expressed as the standardized residual of the regression of SA on CA (SAsr). Hierarchical multiple regression was used.

RESULTS:

Body size accounted for ≥50% of the variance in grip strength in both CA groups; the body size × SAsr for each method and SAsr alone added little to the explained variance. Body size, body size × SAsr interactions, and SAsr per se with each method accounted for small percentages of variance in motor tasks among players 9-12 years, while body size explained a larger proportion of variance in motor tasks (except the endurance run) among players 13-16 years; body size × SAsr interactions for TW2 and TW3 more so than Fels added to the explained variances. For the endurance run, only SAsr per se with each method accounted for significant portions of the variance.

CONCLUSION:

Body size and the three estimates of SA significantly influenced strength and motor performance, but the explained variance varied between CA groups and among SA methods and performance tasks.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Soccer / Body Size / Athletic Performance Limits: Adolescent / Child / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Am J Hum Biol Journal subject: BIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Soccer / Body Size / Athletic Performance Limits: Adolescent / Child / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Am J Hum Biol Journal subject: BIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: