Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application Value of High-Quality Nursing in Operating Room in Rectal Cancer Operation and its Influence on Postoperative Rehabilitation.
Liu, Juan; Tan, Feng; Zhang, Yihui; Zhou, Ping; Qian, Qian; He, Qiaofang; Xu, Jingpin.
Affiliation
  • Liu J; Department of Anesthesiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Tan F; Department of Infection Management, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Anesthesiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhou P; Department of Anesthesiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Qian Q; Department of Anesthesiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • He Q; Department of Anesthesiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Xu J; Department of Anesthesiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Surg Innov ; 31(3): 274-285, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38468453
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To study the value of high-quality care in operating room during operation of patients with rectal cancer and the effect of this nursing model on postoperative rehabilitation.

METHODS:

This study recruited 72 patients with rectal cancer, including 36 in the control group and 36 in the observation group. Patients in the control group received routine care, and those in the observation group received high-quality care in operating room.

RESULTS:

The anxiety score (5.50 ± .77 vs 10. 08 ± 1.13), stress score (6.97 ± .60 vs 8.61 ± .99), and depression score (4.02 ± .65 vs 5.50 ± .91) in the observation group were less than the control group after treatment (P < .05). The measured values of diastolic blood pressure (73.19 ± 1.96 vs 86.13 ± 2.0), systolic blood pressure (121.08 ± 1.62 vs 130.63 ± 2.84), heart rate (73.05 ± 1.63 vs 87.11 ± 2.91) and adrenaline E(E) (58.40 ± 3.02 vs 61.42 ± 3.86) in the observation group were less than the control group after treatment (P < .05). The cooperation degree (94.44 vs 75.00) in the observation group was greater than the control group, but the operation time (308.47 ± 9.92 vs 339.47 ± 12.70), postoperative intestinal function recovery time (16.30 ± 1.14 vs 30.94 ± 2.10) and length of stay (10.47 ± 1.85 vs 13.33 ± 1.95) were all shorter than the control group (P < .05). The nasopharyngeal temperature in the observation group was greater than the control group at 30 minutes during operation (36.16 ± .50 vs 35.19 ± .40) and after operation, and fear score (2.22 ± .42 vs 3.63 ± .72) was less than the control group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION:

The application of high-quality care in the operating room during rectal cancer surgery has a significantly good clinical outcome.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Surg Innov Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Surg Innov Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: