Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
hinotoriTM vs. da Vinci®: propensity score-matched analysis of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kohjimoto, Yasuo; Yamashita, Shimpei; Iwagami, Sohei; Muraoka, Satoshi; Wakamiya, Takahito; Hara, Isao.
Affiliation
  • Kohjimoto Y; Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
  • Yamashita S; Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan. keito608@wakayama-med.ac.jp.
  • Iwagami S; Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
  • Muraoka S; Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
  • Wakamiya T; Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
  • Hara I; Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 130, 2024 Mar 18.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38498237
ABSTRACT
hinotori™ is a recently developed surgical robot system. The present study aims to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) by the hinotori™ system compared with those of the longer-established da Vinci® system. This study includes 100 consecutive patients who underwent RARP by da Vinci® and 60 patients who underwent RARP by hinotori™. To minimize imbalances of patient demographics between the two groups, 11 propensity score-matching was performed, and 43 patients each were assigned to the da Vinci® and hinotori™ groups after matching. In the propensity score-matched cohort, we could not find significant differences in patient demographics between the two groups. Surgical outcomes, operative time, and console time in the hinotori™ group were significantly longer than those in the da Vinci® group. Meanwhile, we could not find significant differences in other outcomes between the two groups, such as estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or 4) or length of hospital stay after surgery. The rate of positive cancer margin in the hinotori™ group was higher than that in the da Vinci® group, but significant difference could not be found between the two groups. Moreover, we could not find significant differences in urinary continence rates after surgery between the da Vinci® and hinotori™ groups. Our results suggest that the hinotori™ surgical robot system could provide comparable surgical outcomes to that of the da Vinci® system for patients undergoing RARP.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Robotics / Robotic Surgical Procedures Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Robot Surg / J. robot. surg. (Internet) / Journal of robotic surgery (Internet) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Robotics / Robotic Surgical Procedures Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Robot Surg / J. robot. surg. (Internet) / Journal of robotic surgery (Internet) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: