Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Video-Based Approach to Assess Physical Function in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis.
Aily, Jéssica B; da Silva, Alyssa Conte; de Noronha, Marcos; White, Daniel K; Mattiello, Stela M.
Affiliation
  • Aily JB; Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • da Silva AC; Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Noronha M; Department of Physiotherapy, Community and Allied Health, La Trobe University Bendigo Campus, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
  • White DK; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
  • Mattiello SM; Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Phys Ther ; 104(6)2024 Jun 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537274
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to determine the concurrent validity and reliability of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International recommended performance-based tests delivered by video-based in adults with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS:

Thirty-two participants (aged 40-70 years; 15 men) undertook assessments of 4 performance-based tests via both video-based (real-time and recorded) and face-to-face approaches, on the same day. Outcome measures were performance-based test and the number of technical issues encountered. The performance-based tests included the 40-Meter Fast-Paced Walk Test (velocity, m/s), the 30-Second Chair Stand Test (number of repetitions), the Stair Climb Test (time, seconds), and the Timed "Up & Go" Test (time, seconds). The Bland-Altman limit of agreement measures, standard error of measurement (SEM), coefficient of variation (CV), minimal detectable changes, and bias (mean difference) were employed to analyze the concurrent validity between video-based and face-to-face approaches of the performance-based tests. Reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients, CV, and SEM.

RESULTS:

A high degree of concurrent validity for the Timed "Up & Go" Test (bias = -0.22), the 30-Second Chair Stand Test (bias = -0.22), the Stair Climb Test (bias = -0.31), and the 40-Meter Fast-Paced Walk Test (bias = -0.06) was found. SEM and CV values were within the acceptable level for concurrent validity. There was a high degree of reliability demonstrated for all tests analyzed. Intraclass correlation coefficient measures ranged from 0.95 to 1.00 for intrarater reliability, and from 0.95 to 0.99 for interrater reliability.

CONCLUSIONS:

Video-based assessment of physical performance tests is a valid and reliable tool for measuring physical function among adults with knee osteoarthritis via Microsoft Teams (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA, USA). IMPACT Video-based assessment is a promising public health tool to measure physical function in adults with knee osteoarthritis.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Video Recording / Osteoarthritis, Knee Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Phys Ther / Phys. ther / Physical therapy Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Video Recording / Osteoarthritis, Knee Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Phys Ther / Phys. ther / Physical therapy Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: