Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence of Dysbetalipoproteinemia in the UK Biobank According to Different Diagnostic Criteria.
Paquette, Martine; Trinder, Mark; Guay, Simon-Pierre; Brunham, Liam R; Baass, Alexis.
Affiliation
  • Paquette M; Lipids, Nutrition, and Cardiovascular Prevention Clinic of the Montreal Clinical Research Institute, Montreal Québec, H2W 1R7, Canada.
  • Trinder M; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Centre for Heart and Lung Innovation, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
  • Guay SP; Lipids, Nutrition, and Cardiovascular Prevention Clinic of the Montreal Clinical Research Institute, Montreal Québec, H2W 1R7, Canada.
  • Brunham LR; Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Université de Montréal, Montréal Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada.
  • Baass A; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Centre for Heart and Lung Innovation, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38625929
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT Dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is a multifactorial disorder that disrupts the normal metabolism of remnant lipoproteins, causing increased risk of cardiovascular disease. However, establishing a proper diagnosis is difficult and the true prevalence of the disease in the general population remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE:

The objectives were to study the prevalence of the disease and to validate the performance of different clinical diagnostic criteria in a large population-based cohort.

METHODS:

This study included 453 437 participants from the UK Biobank. DBL was established in participants having an ε2ε2 genotype with mixed dyslipidemia or lipid-lowering therapy use (n=964). The different diagnostic criteria for DBL were applied in individuals without lipid-lowering medication (n=370 039, n=534 DBL), to compare their performance.

RESULTS:

Overall, 0.6% of participants had an ε2ε2 genotype, of which 36% were classified as DBL, for a disease prevalence of 0.2% (1469). The prevalence of DBL was similar between the different genetic ancestries (≤0.2%). Several diagnostic criteria showed good sensitivity for the diagnosis of DBL (>90%), but they suffered from a very low positive predictive value (0.6%-15.4%).

CONCLUSION:

This study reported for the first time the prevalence of DBL in the UK Biobank according to genetic ancestry. Furthermore, we provided the first external validation of different diagnostic criteria for DBL in a large population-based cohort and highlighted the fact that these criteria should not be used to diagnose DBL alone but should rather be used as a first screening step to determine which individuals may benefit from genetic testing to confirm the diagnosis.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: