Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of care bundles for acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang, Shuzhen; Chen, Yixin; Zhou, Fangfang; Wang, Lailiang; Luo, Qun.
Affiliation
  • Zhang S; Department of Nephrology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
  • Chen Y; Department of Nephrology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhou F; Department of Nephrology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang L; Department of Nephrology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
  • Luo Q; Department of Nephrology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0302179, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630728
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequent among in-hospital patients with high incidence and mortality. Implementing a series of evidence-based AKI care bundles may improve patient outcomes by reducing changeable standards of care. The aim of this meta-analysis was therefore to appraise the influences of AKI care bundles on patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We explored three international databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and two Chinese databases (Wanfang Data and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) for studies from databases inception until November 30, 2022, comparing the impact of different AKI care bundles with usual standards of care in patients with or at risk for AKI. The study quality of non-randomized controlled trials and randomized controlled trials was evaluated by the NIH Study Quality Assessment Tool and the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Heterogeneity between studies was appraised by Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. The possible origins of heterogeneity between studies were assessed adopting Meta-regression and subgroup analyses. Funnel plot asymmetry and Egger regression and Begg correlation tests were performed to discover potential publication bias. Data analysis was completed by software (RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.0). The primary outcome was short- or long-term mortality. The secondary outcomes involved the incidence and severity of AKI.

RESULTS:

Sixteen studies containing 25,690 patients and 25,903 AKI episodes were included. In high-risk AKI patients determined by novel biomarkers, electronic alert or risk prediction score, the application of AKI care bundles significantly reduced the AKI incidence (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.96; p = 0.02; I2 = 84%) and AKI severity (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.89; p = 0.01; I2 = 65%). No strong evidence is available to prove that care bundles can significantly reduce mortality (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.58-2.30; p = 0.68; I2 = 97%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The introduction of AKI care bundles in routine clinical practice can effectively improve the outcomes of patients with or at-risk of AKI. However, the accumulated evidence is limited and not strong enough to make definite conclusions.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Acute Kidney Injury Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: PLoS ONE (Online) / PLoS One / PLos ONE Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Acute Kidney Injury Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: PLoS ONE (Online) / PLoS One / PLos ONE Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: