Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multicenter validation study of a treatment selection MAP for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Ikeda, Masafumi; Hijioka, Susumu; Ito, Tetsuhide; Matsumoto, Shigemi; Honma, Yoshitaka; Ueno, Makoto; Okano, Naohiro; Aoki, Taku; Furuse, Junji.
Affiliation
  • Ikeda M; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
  • Hijioka S; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ito T; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, International University of Health and Welfare Graduate School of Medicine, Neuroendocrine Tumor Center, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Matsumoto S; Department of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Honma Y; Department of Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ueno M; Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Okano N; Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Aoki T; Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
  • Furuse J; Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 54(8): 880-886, 2024 Aug 14.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677983
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Somatostatin analogs, molecular-targeted agents and cytotoxic anticancer agents are available as therapeutic agents for the systemic treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and we have developed a first-line treatment selection MAP to enable selection of the optimal treatment strategy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The purpose of this study was to validate the usefulness of the treatment selection MAP.

METHODS:

Patients who had received systemic therapy for a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor between January 2017 and December 2020 were compared according to whether they had been treated as recommended by the MAP (matched patients) or not (unmatched patients) to determine whether better outcomes were achieved by the matched patients. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival of the matched group and unmatched groups in the somatostatin analog, molecular-targeted agent and cytotoxic anticancer agents areas of the MAP.

RESULTS:

There were 41 (55%) MAP-matched patients in all areas among the 74 patients registered at seven hospitals. The MAP-matched rates were 100, 77 and 38% in the somatostatin analog area, molecular-targeted agent area and cytotoxic anticancer agents area, respectively. All of the unmatched patients had been selected for less intensive treatment. The median progression-free survival in the matched group and unmatched group in the molecular-targeted agent area of the MAP were 46.6 and 15.4 months, respectively, and a multivariate analysis identified MAP-matched (hazard ratio 0.18 [95% confidence interval 0.04-0.87], P = 0.032) as the only significant independent favorable predictive factor.

CONCLUSION:

The usefulness of the MAP for treatment selection was validated in the molecular-targeted agent area of the MAP.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatic Neoplasms / Neuroendocrine Tumors Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Jpn J Clin Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatic Neoplasms / Neuroendocrine Tumors Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Jpn J Clin Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: