Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Italian adaptation of the Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS).
Liuzza, Marco Tullio; Tolomeo, Eva; Occhiuto, Giuseppe; Cilurzo, Martina; Martino, Iolanda; Cerasa, Antonio.
Affiliation
  • Liuzza MT; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Calabria, Italy.
  • Tolomeo E; Department of Health Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Calabria, Italy.
  • Occhiuto G; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Calabria, Italy.
  • Cilurzo M; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Calabria, Italy.
  • Martino I; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Calabria, Italy.
  • Cerasa A; Institute for biomedical research and innovation, National Research Council, Messina, Sicily, Italy.
PeerJ ; 12: e17145, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38699191
ABSTRACT

Background:

Suggestibility is a personality trait that reflects a general tendency to accept messages. The Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS) is a self-report scale developed to measure the degree of individuals' perceptions of their suggestibility. This study aimed to adapt the MISS in an Italian sample.

Methods:

We conducted two studies. In the first study, 345 subjects (270 females (78%), mean age = 36.21 years ± 14.06 SD) completed the translated Italian version of the MISS, composed of five subscales (consumer suggestibility; persuadability; sensation contagion; physiological reactivity; peer conformity). We investigated the structural validity of the scale through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) testing four measurement models (unidimensional, four-factor, hierarchical four factors, and bifactor) and explored reliability in terms of internal consistency through the McDonald's omega. In the second study, we cross-validated the MISS on a new independent sample. We enrolled 277 participants (196 females (71%), mean age 30.56, SD = 12.58) who underwent the new version of the scale. We performed factor analyses to test structural validity and compared four measurement models. Then, we investigated reliability and conducted a latent variable analysis to explore divergent validity.

Results:

The CFA in the first study revealed a bifactor solution of the MISS. This structure was interpretable and provided an adequate fit for the data. The final version of the scale was reduced to forty-six items with globally good indices of adaptation. The scale also demonstrated acceptable reliability in terms of internal consistency through the McDonald's Hierarchical Omega. In the second study, we found that the bifactor structure was confirmed. Factor loadings inspection revealed that there was no justification to report only the separate scores for the subscales. We also found that the scale showed good internal consistency, but mixed evidence for divergent validity.

Conclusions:

In the end, the Italian version of the MISS demonstrated good psychometric properties which will be discussed in detail below.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychometrics Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: PeerJ Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychometrics Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: PeerJ Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: