Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Selah trial: A preference-based partially randomized waitlist control study of three stress management interventions.
Proeschold-Bell, Rae Jean; Eagle, David E; Tice, Logan C; Platt, Alyssa; Yao, Jia; Larkins, Jessie S; Kim, Eunsoo Timothy; Rash, Joshua A.
Affiliation
  • Proeschold-Bell RJ; Duke Global Health Institute, Duke Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
  • Eagle DE; Duke Department of Sociology, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research.
  • Tice LC; Duke Global Health Institute, Duke Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
  • Platt A; Duke Global Health Institute, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham NC 27705, USA.
  • Yao J; Duke Global Health Institute, Duke Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
  • Larkins JS; Duke Global Health Institute, Duke Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
  • Kim ET; Duke Global Health Institute, Duke Center for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
  • Rash JA; Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Transl Behav Med ; 2024 May 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718169
ABSTRACT
Chronic stress undermines psychological and physiological health. We tested three remotely delivered stress management interventions among clergy, accounting for intervention preferences. United Methodist clergy in North Carolina enrolled in a partially randomized, preference-based waitlist control trial. The interventions were mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), Daily Examen prayer practice, and Stress Proofing (stress inoculation plus breathing skills). Co-primary outcomes were symptoms of stress (Calgary Symptoms of Stress Inventory) and 48-hour ambulatory heart rate variability (HRV) at 12 weeks compared to waitlist control. Survey data were collected at 0, 12, and 24 weeks and 48-hour ambulatory HRV at 0 and 12 weeks. The 255 participants were 91% White and 48% female. Forty-nine participants (22%) without a preference were randomly assigned between the three interventions (n = 40) and waitlist control (n = 9). Two hundred six participants (78%) with a preference were randomly assigned to waitlist control (n = 62) or their preferred intervention (n = 144). Compared to waitlist control, MBSR [mean difference (MD) = -0.30, 95% CI -0.41, -0.20; P < .001] and Stress Proofing (MD = -0.27, 95% CI -0.40, -0.14; P < .001) participants had lower stress symptoms at 12 weeks; Daily Examen participants did not until 24 weeks (MD = -0.24, 95% CI -0.41, -0.08). MBSR participants demonstrated improvement in HRV at 12 weeks (MD = +3.32 ms; 95% CI 0.21, 6.44; P = .036). MBSR demonstrated robust improvement in self-reported and objective physical correlates of stress; Stress Proofing and Daily Examen resulted in improvements in self-reported correlates of stress. These brief practices were sustainable and beneficial for United Methodist clergy during the heightened stressors of the COVID pandemic. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04625777.
A common source of stress, which can harm physical and mental health, is work. Clergy engage in a profession that requires toggling between varied and interpersonally complex tasks, providing emotional labor, and experiencing stressors such as public criticism. Practical, brief practices are needed to manage occupational stress. We invited all United Methodist clergy in North Carolina to enroll in a stress management study. Participants chose their preferred of three

interventions:

mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), Daily Examen prayer practice, or Stress Proofing (a combination of stress inoculation plus breathing skills). Clergy without a preference were randomly assigned to one of the three interventions and a waiting group. Clergy with a preference were randomly assigned to either begin the intervention or wait at least 6 months and provide data while waiting. Participants practiced each of the three interventions at high levels across 24 weeks. Compared to clergy who waited for an intervention, MBSR participants evidenced robust improvement in self-reported (stress and anxiety symptoms) and physiological (heart rate variability measured across 48 hours) outcomes, whereas Stress Proofing and the Daily Examen only resulted in improvements in self-reported outcomes. The three brief practices were sustainable and beneficial for United Methodist clergy during the heightened stressors of the COVID pandemic.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Transl Behav Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Transl Behav Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: