Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The efficacy of exercise therapy for rotator cuff related shoulder pain according to the FITT principle: a systematic review with meta-analyses.
Lafrance, Simon; Charron, Maxime; Dubé, Marc-Olivier; Desmeules, François; Roy, Jean-Sébastien; Juul-Kristensen, Birgit; Kennedy, Leonora; McCreesh, Karen.
Affiliation
  • Lafrance S; School of Rehabilitation,Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Charron M; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Center, Université de Montréal Affiliated Research Center,Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Dubé MO; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Center, Université de Montréal Affiliated Research Center,Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Desmeules F; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • Roy JS; Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • Juul-Kristensen B; La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Center, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Kennedy L; School of Rehabilitation,Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • McCreesh K; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Research Center, Université de Montréal Affiliated Research Center,Montreal, QC, Canada.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther ; : 1-26, 2024 Jun 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848304
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the efficacy of exercise interventions with differing frequency, intensity, type and time (FITT) on shoulder pain and disability in people with rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP).

DESIGN:

Intervention systematic review with meta-analyses. LITERATURE SEARCH Electronic searches were conducted up to May 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of exercise interventions differing in prescription according to the FITT principle, in people with RCRSP. DATA

SYNTHESIS:

Separate meta-analyses comparing exercise type (specific versus non-specific exercise) and intensity (high versus low) were conducted. GRADE was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS:

Twenty-two RCTs (n=1281) were included. There was moderate certainty evidence that motor control exercise programs, when compared to non-specific exercise programs, significantly reduced disability in the short- (SMD -0.29; 95%CI -0.51 to -0.07; n=323; 7 RCTs) and medium-term (SMD -0.33; 95%CI -0.57 to -0.09; n=286; 5 RCTs), but not pain in the short-term (SMD -0.19; 95%CI -0.41 to 0.03; n=323; 7 RCTs). Uncertainties remained regarding other exercise types (eccentric and scapula-focused exercise programs) versus non-specific exercise programs, and exercise intensity due to low to very low certainty evidence. No trials were identified that compared different frequencies or times.

CONCLUSION:

For adults with RCRSP, motor control exercise programs were probably slightly superior to non-specific exercise programs. However, it is unclear if the effects were due to motor control exercise or to other program characteristics such as progression and tailoring.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...