Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The relative merits of using a high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T assay compared to a nonhigh-sensitivity troponin T assay after noncardiac surgery.
Borges, Flavia K; Sessler, Daniel I; Tiboni, Maria; Patel, Ameen; LeManach, Yannick; Heels-Ansdell, Diane; Srinathan, Sadeesh; Wang, Chew Yin; Chow, Clara; Duceppe, Emmanuelle; Kavsak, Peter; Ofori, Sandra N; Pettit, Shirley; Berwanger, Otavio; Kurz, Andrea; Turan, Alparslan; Tonelli, Ana Claudia; Devereaux, P J.
Affiliation
  • Borges FK; Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. Electronic address: Flavia.bor
  • Sessler DI; Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.
  • Tiboni M; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Patel A; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • LeManach Y; Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Heels-Ansdell D; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Srinathan S; Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
  • Wang CY; Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia.
  • Chow C; Department of Cardiology, Westmead Applied Research Centre (WARC), University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Duceppe E; Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
  • Kavsak P; Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University.
  • Ofori SN; Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Pettit S; Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Berwanger O; George Institute for Global Health UK and Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Kurz A; Departments of General Anesthesiology and Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA; Department of General Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Graz, Austria.
  • Turan A; Departments of General Anesthesiology and Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA.
  • Tonelli AC; Department of Medicine, Unisinos University, São Leopoldo, Brazil; Department of Internal Medicine, Internal Medicine Service, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Devereaux PJ; Perioperative Medicine and Surgical Research Unit, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Am Heart J ; 275: 45-52, 2024 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851520
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Troponin elevation after noncardiac surgery is associated with an elevated risk of 30-day mortality. Little is known about relative merit of using a high-sensitivity Troponin T (hsTnT), the fifth-generation assay, vs the nonhigh sensitivity Troponin T (non-hsTnT), the fourth-generation assay, in the noncardiac surgery setting. We aimed to identify whether hsTnT can identify additional patients at risk that would have gone undetected with non-hsTnT measurement.

METHODS:

The VISION Study included 40,004 noncardiac surgery patients with postoperative troponin measurements. Among them, 1,806 patients had both fourth-generation non-hsTnT and fifth-generation hsTnT concomitant measurements (4,451 paired results). We compared the absolute concentrations, the timing, and the impact of different thresholds on predicting 30-day major cardiovascular complications (composite of death, nonfatal cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization, and congestive heart failure).

RESULTS:

Based on the manufacturers' threshold of 14 ng/L, 580 (32.1%) patients had postoperative hsTnT concentrations greater than the threshold, while their non-hsTnT concentrations were below the manufacturer's threshold. These 580 patients had higher risk of major cardiovascular events (OR 2.33; CI 95% 1.04-5.23; P = .049) than patients with hsTnT concentrations below the manufacturer threshold. Among patients with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, only 50% would be detected by the fourth-generation non-hsTnT assay at 6 to 12 hours postoperative as compared to 85% with the fifth-generation hsTnT assay (P-value < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Within the first 3 postoperative days, fifth-generation hsTnT identified at least 1 in 3 patients with troponin elevation that would have gone undetected by fourth-generation non-hsTnT using published thresholds in this setting. Furthermore, fifth-generation hsTnT identified patients with an elevation earlier than fourth-generation non-hsTnT, indicating potential to improve postoperative risk stratification.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Biomarkers / Troponin T Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am Heart J Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Biomarkers / Troponin T Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am Heart J Year: 2024 Document type: Article