Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes in obese patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) versus open radical prostatectomy (ORP): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang, Chong-Jian; Chen, Cai-Xia; Liu, Yang; Wen, Zhi; Li, Hong-Yuan; Huang, Hao-Tian; Yang, Xue-Song.
Affiliation
  • Wang CJ; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
  • Chen CX; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
  • Liu Y; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
  • Wen Z; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
  • Li HY; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
  • Huang HT; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
  • Yang XS; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China. Xuesongyang2022@163.com.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 248, 2024 Jun 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38856862
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the perioperative outcomes associated with robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RARP) versus open radical prostatectomy (ORP) in the obese population diagnosed with prostate cancer. We performed a comprehensive search in key databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, encompassing studies of all languages, with a final search date of April 2024. We also omitted articles that consisted of conference abstracts and content that was not pertinent to our study. The aggregated outcomes were evaluated utilizing the metrics of weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs). A sensitivity analysis was also integrated into our assessment. The meta-analysis was facilitated by employing Stata/MP version 18 software. Additionally, the study was duly registered with PROSPERO under the identifier CRD 42024540216. This meta-analysis, which included five trials, shows that compared to ORP, RARP is associated with a reduced estimated blood loss (EBL) (WMD -445.77, 95%CI -866.08, -25.45; p = 0.038), a decreased transfusion rate (OR 0.17, 95%CI 0.13, 0.21; p < 0.001), and a diminished overall complication rate (OR 0.71, 95%CI 0.58, 0.86; p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in operative time (OT) (WMD 1.88, 95%CI -46.53, 50.28; p = 0.939) or length of stay (LOS) (WMD -0.41, 95%CI -1.07, 0.25; p = 0.221). Among patients with obesity and prostate cancer, RARP demonstrates advantages over ORP by reducing estimated blood loss, transfusion requirements, and the incidence of complications. Notably, there were no significant differences in operative duration and hospital stay between the two surgical approaches. These findings suggest that RARP could be a preferable surgical option for obese individuals with prostate cancer.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatectomy / Prostatic Neoplasms / Robotic Surgical Procedures / Length of Stay / Obesity Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Robot Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatectomy / Prostatic Neoplasms / Robotic Surgical Procedures / Length of Stay / Obesity Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Robot Surg Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...