Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can we encourage the endoscopic treatment for external snapping hip (ESH)? A systematic review of current concepts.
Giai Via, Riccardo; Elzeiny, Ahmed; Pantè, Salvatore; De Vivo, Simone; Massè, Alessandro; Giachino, Matteo.
Affiliation
  • Giai Via R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Via Gianfranco, University of Turin, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), Zuretti 29, 10126, Turin, Italy. riccardo.giaivia@unito.it.
  • Elzeiny A; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Turin CTO, Via Zuretti 29, 10126, Turin, Italy. riccardo.giaivia@unito.it.
  • Pantè S; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kafr El Sheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt.
  • De Vivo S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Via Gianfranco, University of Turin, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), Zuretti 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.
  • Massè A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Via Gianfranco, University of Turin, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), Zuretti 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.
  • Giachino M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Via Gianfranco, University of Turin, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), Zuretti 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38874780
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Snapping hip syndrome (SHS) is characterized by snapping sensation and pain and affects up to 10% of the general population. External snapping hip syndrome (ESHS), the most common form, is often due to repetitive movements in sports or anatomical predispositions. Conservative treatment includes physiotherapy and corticosteroid injections, while surgery is considered if conservative measures fail. Open surgical techniques carry several risks, while modern arthroscopic techniques offer less invasive options, such as endoscopic iliotibial band release (ITB) and gluteus maximus tenotomy. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A systematic review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were searched in four databases Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Medline. The selected articles were evaluated according to the criteria of levels of evidence. The Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to analyze the retrospective studies. This paper was registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).

RESULTS:

Out of 9 included studies, 403 patients with 689 hips underwent endoscopic treatment. ITB release and his variations were the main surgical techniques. Gluteus maximus tenotomy was also used in some studies. Postoperative rehabilitation protocols varied. Patients generally experienced significant improvements in symptoms and functional outcomes, with low rates of recurrence (1.02%) and revision (0.15%). Complications were minimal.

CONCLUSIONS:

Endoscopic treatment of ESH shows favorable results, improving functional outcomes and returning patients to pre-injury activity levels. Long-term efficacy and costeffectiveness need to be evaluated, emphasizing the importance of large-scale prospective randomized trials to clarify surgery's benefits in refractory ESH cases.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...