Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy and postoperative assessment of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws during scoliosis surgery compared with conventional freehand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cui, Wei; Liu, Xinglin; Zhao, Zhiheng; Feng, Zihe; Meng, Xianglong.
Affiliation
  • Cui W; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing AnZhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 2 Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
  • Liu X; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing AnZhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 2 Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
  • Zhao Z; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing AnZhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 2 Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
  • Feng Z; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University of China, S Sanlitun Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
  • Meng X; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing AnZhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 2 Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. spinesurgeonmeng@ccmu.edu.cn.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 365, 2024 Jun 20.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902785
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND:

The complexity of human anatomical structures and the variability of vertebral body structures in patients with scoliosis pose challenges in pedicle screw placement during spinal deformity correction surgery. Through technological advancements, robots have been introduced in spinal surgery to assist with pedicle screw placement.

METHODS:

A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and CNKI databases and comparative studies assessing the accuracy and postoperative efficacy of pedicle screw placement using robotic assistance or freehand techniques in patients with scoliosis were included. The analysis evaluated the accuracy of screw placement, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, length of postoperative hospital stay, and complications.

RESULTS:

Seven studies comprising 584 patients were included in the meta-analysis, with 282 patients (48.3%) in the robot-assisted group and 320 (51.7%) in the freehand group. Robot-assisted placement showed significantly better clinically acceptable screw placement results compared with freehand placement (odds ratio [OR] 2.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.75-3.91, P < 0.0001). However, there were no statistically significant differences in achieving "perfect" screw placement between the two groups (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.95-2.46, P = 0.08). The robot-assisted group had longer operation durations (mean deviation [MD] 43.64, 95% CI 22.25-64.74, P < 0.0001) but shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD - 1.12, 95% CI - 2.15 to - 0.08, P = 0.03) than the freehand group. There were no significant differences in overall complication rates or intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. There was no significant difference in Cobb Angle between the two groups before and after operation.

CONCLUSION:

Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement offers higher accuracy and shorter hospital stay than freehand placement in scoliosis surgery; although the robotics approach is associated with longer operative durations, similar complication rates and intraoperative blood loss.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Scoliosis / Robotic Surgical Procedures / Pedicle Screws Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Scoliosis / Robotic Surgical Procedures / Pedicle Screws Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: