Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prediction of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma using MRI histogram analysis.
Liu, Xianwang; Han, Tao; Wang, Yuzhu; Liu, Hong; Zhou, Junlin.
Affiliation
  • Liu X; Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China.
  • Han T; Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang Y; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
  • Liu H; Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhou J; Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Neurosurg Rev ; 47(1): 285, 2024 Jun 22.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38907038
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) histogram parameters in predicting O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter (pMGMT) methylation status in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM). From November 2021 to July 2023, forty-six IDH-wildtype GBM patients with known pMGMT methylation status (25 unmethylated and 21 methylated) were enrolled in this retrospective study. Conventional MRI signs (including location, across the midline, margin, necrosis/cystic changes, hemorrhage, and enhancement pattern) were assessed and recorded. Histogram parameters were extracted and calculated by Firevoxel software based on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CET1). Differences and diagnostic performance of conventional MRI signs and histogram parameters between the pMGMT-unmethylated and pMGMT-methylated groups were analyzed and compared. No differences were observed in the conventional MRI signs between pMGMT-unmethylated and pMGMT-methylated groups (all p > 0.05). Compared with the pMGMT-methylated group, pMGMT-unmethylated showed a higher minimum, mean, Perc.01, Perc.05, Perc.10, Perc.25, Perc.50, and coefficient of variation (CV) (all p < 0.05). Among all significant CET1 histogram parameters, minimum achieved the best distinguishing performance, with an area under the curve of 0.836. CET1 histogram parameters could provide additional value in predicting pMGMT methylation status in patients with IDH-wildtype GBM, with minimum being the most promising parameter.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Neoplasms / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Promoter Regions, Genetic / Glioblastoma / DNA Methylation / Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Neurosurg Rev Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Neoplasms / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Promoter Regions, Genetic / Glioblastoma / DNA Methylation / Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Neurosurg Rev Year: 2024 Document type: Article