Can local application of vancomycin reduce surgical site infection rate after open lumbar fusion surgery?: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT

Surgical site infection (SSI) after posterior open lumbar fusion (POLF) is a major concern for both surgeons and patients. We sought to explore whether local application of vancomycin could decrease the rate of SSI. We reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent POLF between June 2015 and June 2022 at 3 spinal centers. Patients were divided into those who received local vancomycin (vancomycin group) and those who did not (non-vancomycin group). The SSI rates at 12 months postoperatively were compared between the 2 groups. Although a trend toward a lower infection rate was observed in the vancomycin group than in the non-vancomycin group; the difference was not statistically significant (3.6% vs 5.5%, P = .121). However, we found that the postoperative SSI rate was significantly lower in the vancomycin group than in the non-vancomycin group (4.9% vs 11.4%, P = .041) in patients ≥ 2 fused segments, while there was no significant difference in postoperative SSI rate in patients with single fusion segment (3.1% vs 3.6%, P = .706). The logistic regression analysis indicated that the SSI rate in the non-vancomycin group was approximately 2.498 times higher than that in the vancomycin group (P = .048, odds ratio 2.498, 95% confidence interval 1.011-6.617) in patients with ≥2 fused segments. In SSI patients with confirmed pathogens, the SSI rate of Gram-negative bacteria in the vancomycin group was significantly higher than that in the non-vancomycin group (10/14 [71.4%] vs 5/22 [31.8%]), whereas the SSI rate of Gram-positive bacteria in the vancomycin group was significantly lower than that in the non-vancomycin group (4/14 [28.6%] vs 15/22 [68.2%]). Local administration of vancomycin is recommended in patients with ≥2 fused segments as it may facilitate to reduce the postoperative rate of SSI after POLF. Additionally, the local use of vancomycin can decrease the Gram-positive bacterial infections but is not effective against Gram-negative infections, which indirectly leads to an increase in the proportion of Gram-negative infections in SSI patients with confirmed pathogens.