Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Simplified GBR Treatment and Evaluation of Posterior Seibert Class I Ridge Defects via Bio-collagen and Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Retrospective Study.
Wang, Zhi; Zheng, Yafeng; Xu, Jiaqi; Jia, Qi; Jiang, Heng Bo; Lee, Eui-Seok.
Affiliation
  • Wang Z; Second Clinical Division, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, 100101, China. diana5401@163.com.
  • Zheng Y; Second Clinical Division, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, 100101, China.
  • Xu J; Department of Stomatological Technology, School of Stomatology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
  • Jia Q; Department and Research Institute of Dental Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
  • Jiang HB; Department of Stomatological Technology, School of Stomatology, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
  • Lee ES; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, 08308, Republic of Korea. ees225@korea.ac.kr.
Tissue Eng Regen Med ; 2024 Jun 28.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38943036
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Classical guided bone regeneration (GBR) treatments can achieve favorable clinical results for ridge defects. However, extensive bone augmentation in the non-esthetic area in the posterior region for minor ridge defects is unnecessary. Therefore, this study used a collagen and Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) mixture for bone augmentation on minor posterior ridge defects and evaluated the effects.

METHODS:

22 Seibert Class I ridge defects were treated with BC and covered with a PRF membrane (simplified guided bone regeneration, simplified GBR) and other 22 were treated with Bio-Oss and covered with Bio-Gide (classical GBR). Cone-beam computed tomography imaging was conducted 6 months post-surgery to compare the ridge's horizontal width (HW) and buccal ridge's horizontal width to assess the osteogenic effect. In addition, the buccal ridge contour morphology was studied and classified.

RESULTS:

The buccal ridge contour of simplified GBR was Type A in 14 cases, Type B in 7 cases, and Type C in 1 case and it of classical GBR was Type A in 11 cases, Type B in 8 cases, and Type C in 3 cases. The mean HW significantly increased by 1.50 mm of simplified GBR treatment, while it increased by 1.83 mm in classical GBR treatment.

CONCLUSION:

The combined use of BC and PRF had a significant effect on bone augmentation and this treatment exhibited promising clinical results for correcting posterior Seibert Class I ridge defects. The morphological classification of the reconstructive effect in this study can be utilized in future clinical work.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Tissue Eng Regen Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Tissue Eng Regen Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...