Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-Centered Outcomes of a Lymphedema Pump in Patients with Symptomatic Lower Extremity Edema.
Murray-Ramcharan, Max; Escurra, Michelle Feltes; Donaldson, Brian; Raza Rizvi, Syed Ali.
Affiliation
  • Murray-Ramcharan M; Department of Surgery, Harlem Hospital Center, Columbia University. Department of Surgery, Harlem Hospital Center, Columbia University, New York, NY. Electronic address: Maxmr999@gmail.com.
  • Escurra MF; Department of Surgery, Harlem Hospital Center, Columbia University. Department of Surgery, Harlem Hospital Center, Columbia University, New York, NY.
  • Donaldson B; Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Harlem Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY.
  • Raza Rizvi SA; Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Harlem Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 108: 333-337, 2024 Jul 14.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39004279
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Phlebolymphedema is a challenging condition to manage, with limited options for effective treatment. For patients, this may be debilitating and lead to infection, loss of independence and affect quality of life. This study aims to evaluate patient-reported outcomes of an advanced pneumatic compression device (APCD) in the treatment of lower extremity phlebolymphedema.

METHODS:

Patients with diagnosis of lower extremity phlebolymphedema at an acute care facility within the New York City Health and Hospitals Cooperation treated with the Flexitouch (FLX) (Tactile Systems Technology, Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota) APCD from December 2021 to March 2023 were evaluated. Patient-perceived subjective outcomes were assessed via a short questionnaire, with subsequent analysis using chi-squared test. Primary end points were subjective improvements in 1) swelling, 2) pain, and 3) ease of use of device as surrogates for patient satisfaction. Secondary end point was subjective patient-reported compliance, obtained by investigating 1) if patients were trained to use device, and 2) if patients were using the device.

RESULTS:

A total of 52 participants were included in this study, consisting of 30.8% male and 69.2% female patients with a mean age of 71.7 years. While selection criteria did not exclude unilateral disease or alternative etiologies, we note that the entire study population had been diagnosed with bilateral lower extremity lymphedema in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency. Other patient characteristics including race, comorbidities and smoking status were documented in Table 1. Table 2 demonstrates the results of chi-squared analysis. This study noted significant patient-perceived improvement in swelling and pain (91.4% with P < 0.00001; 85.7% with P = 0.00002 respectively) and patient-reported ease of use of the FLX device (85.7% with P = 0.00002). Additional secondary findings included a majority of patients reporting being trained on how to use FLX and also maintaining compliance with the device (69.2% with P = 0.005; 67.3% with P = 0.012 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

FLX APCD use has been found to demonstrate desirable patient-reported outcomes as a general trend. The participants in this study noted statistically significant subjective improvement in swelling and pain, ease of use of device and adherence to training and compliance with device. FLX appears to be positively received by patients, and the authors recommend its consideration for management of bilateral lower extremity phlebolymphedema.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article