Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of preoperative embolization on giant cell tumors of the bone localized in the iliosacral region of the pelvis.
Scheurer, Fabrice; Kaiser, Dominik; Kobe, Adrian; Smolle, Maria; Suter, Daniel; Spirig, José Miguel; Müller, Daniel.
Affiliation
  • Scheurer F; University Sarcoma Center Zürich (CCCZ), Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: Fabrice.scheurer@balgrist.ch.
  • Kaiser D; University Sarcoma Center Zürich (CCCZ), Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Kobe A; Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Smolle M; University Sarcoma Center Zürich (CCCZ), Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Suter D; University Sarcoma Center Zürich (CCCZ), Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Spirig JM; University Spine Center Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Müller D; University Sarcoma Center Zürich (CCCZ), Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Surg Oncol ; 55: 102101, 2024 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39018867
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are aggressive neoplasms, with rare occurrences in the posterior pelvis and sacral area. Surgical challenges in this region include the inability to apply a tourniquet and limited cementation post-curettage due to proximity to neurovascular structures, leading to potential complications. This case-control study explores the impact of preoperative embolization on GCTB located in the iliosacral region.

METHODS:

Five surgeries (January-December 2021) for pelvic GCTB (3 sacrum, 2 posterior ilium) were performed on four patients. Diagnosis was confirmed through preoperative CT-guided biopsies. One surgery involved curettage with PMMA cement filling, while four surgeries had curettage without cavity filling. Preoperative embolization of the tumor feeding vessel occurred approximately 16 h before surgery in two cases. Denosumab treatment was not administered.

RESULTS:

Tumor volume, assessed by preoperative MRI, was comparable between patients with and without preoperative embolization (p = .14). Surgeries without embolization had a mean intraoperative blood loss of 3250 ml, erythrocyte transfusion volume of 1125 ml, and a mean surgical time of 114.5 min for two surgeries. Surgeries with preoperative embolization showed a mean intraoperative blood loss of 1850 ml, no erythrocyte transfusion requirement, and a mean surgical time of 68 min.

CONCLUSION:

Curettage of GCTB in the posterior pelvis and sacrum presents challenges, with significant intraoperative blood loss impacting surgical time and transfusion needs. Preoperative embolization may be beneficial in reducing blood loss during surgery in these cases.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sacrum / Bone Neoplasms / Preoperative Care / Giant Cell Tumor of Bone / Embolization, Therapeutic Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Surg Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sacrum / Bone Neoplasms / Preoperative Care / Giant Cell Tumor of Bone / Embolization, Therapeutic Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Surg Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: