Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using Next-Generation Sequencing to Understand Infection Prevention in Surgical Treatment of Upper Extremity Fractures-A Prospective Cohort Study.
Dehghani, Bijan; DeAngelis, Ryan D; Hallman, Mitchell; Karnuta, Jaret M; Minutillo, Gregory T; Alqazzaz, Aymen; Donegan, Derek J; Mehta, Samir.
Affiliation
  • Dehghani B; From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 32(16): e832-e838, 2024 Aug 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39093461
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Postoperative fracture site infection can lead to notable patient morbidity, increase cost of care, and further contribute to healthcare disparities globally. Dogma suggests surgical blades as a vehicle for introducing bacteria into the surgical site; however, there is a paucity of literature to support this claim. This study uses advanced DNA sequencing to detect bacterial DNA on surgical blades used in upper extremity fracture surgeries.

METHODS:

This was a prospective study, conducted at a high-volume level 1 trauma center. All acute, closed upper extremity fractures requiring surgical stabilization were consecutively enrolled in a prospective fashion. The primary end point was the presence of bacterial DNA on the surgical blade using next-generation sequencing (NGS). At the time of surgery, two blades were sterilely opened. One blade served as the control while the other was used for the initial skin incision. Two negative control blades were opened directly into a sterile container. Two positive control blades were used for skin incision through known infections. All samples were sent for NGS analysis.

RESULTS:

Forty patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 33.5 years, and 30% were female; the median body mass index was 26.52. Humerus fractures were the most common injury (N = 17, 42.5%), followed by clavicle fractures (13, 32.5%) and radius/ulna fractures (10, 25.0%). NGS analysis revealed no contamination of test blades used for skin incision. Three control blades tested positive for bacterial DNA. Negative control blades tested negative for bacterial DNA (0/2); the positive control blades resulted positive for bacterial DNA contamination (2/2).

CONCLUSION:

Surgical blades used for skin incision in the upper extremity are not contaminated with bacterial DNA as analyzed by NGS. This finding challenges previous surgical dogma regarding surgical blade contamination and supports that the same surgical blade can safely be used for deeper dissection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II study IRB approval-IRB#848938.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgical Wound Infection / High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgical Wound Infection / High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: