Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measuring availability of and facility readiness to deliver comprehensive abortion care: experiences and lessons learnt from integrating abortion into WHO's health facility assessments.
Johnston, Heidi Bart; Footman, Katy; Ali, Mohamed Mahmoud; Aly, Eman Abdelkreem; Asmani, Chilanga; Asrat, Sofonias Getachew; Atweam, Dominic Kwabena; Awais, Sayema; Ayiasi, Richard Mangwi; Boamah, Martin Owusu; Chooye, Ovost; Doe, Roseline; Droti, Benson; Elamin, Hayfa; Fofie, Chris; Gholbzouri, Karima; Hadush, Azmach; Hemachandra, Nilmini; Hien, Yelmali; Kasolo, Francis Chisaka; Kipruto, Hillary; Lainez, Yolanda Barbera; Natseri, Nasan; Onyiah, Pamela Amaka; Orach, Christopher Garimoi; Ouangare, Assane; Ouedraogo, Leopold; Sentumbwe-Mugisa, Olive; Sheffel, Ashley; Siyam, Amani; Ssendyona, Martin; Thom, Ellen; Tingueri, Rose Koirine; Traoré, Soumaïla; Uzma, Qudsia; Venter, Wendy; Ganatra, Bela.
Affiliation
  • Johnston HB; UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland johnstonh@who.int.
  • Footman K; UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Ali MM; UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Aly EA; World Health Organisation Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Asmani C; formerly, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Asrat SG; Ghana, World Health Organization, Accra, Ghana.
  • Atweam DK; Ghana, World Health Organization, Accra, Ghana.
  • Awais S; Pakistan Ministry of National Health Services Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Ayiasi RM; Public Health, Muni University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Arua, Uganda.
  • Boamah MO; Ghana, World Health Organization, Accra, Ghana.
  • Chooye O; Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Doe R; Ghana, World Health Organization, Accra, Ghana.
  • Droti B; World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Elamin H; World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Fofie C; Family Health Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
  • Gholbzouri K; World Health Organisation Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Hadush A; Zambia, World Health Organization, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Hemachandra N; Myanmar, World Health Organization, Yangon, Myanmar.
  • Hien Y; Burkina Faso, World Health Organization, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
  • Kasolo FC; Ghana, World Health Organization, Accra, Ghana.
  • Kipruto H; World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Lainez YB; International Health Consultant, Panama City, Panama.
  • Natseri N; Uganda, World Health Organization, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Onyiah PA; World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Orach CG; Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Ouangare A; Directorate of Statistics, Ministry of Health Burkina Faso, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
  • Ouedraogo L; World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Sentumbwe-Mugisa O; Uganda, World Health Organization, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Sheffel A; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Siyam A; World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, New Delhi, India.
  • Ssendyona M; Department for Standards Accreditation and Patient Protection, Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Thom E; Pakistan, World Health Organization, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Tingueri RK; Burkina Faso, World Health Organization, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
  • Traoré S; Directorate of Statistics, Ministry of Health Burkina Faso, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
  • Uzma Q; Pakistan, World Health Organization, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Venter W; Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Ganatra B; UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
BMJ Glob Health ; 8(Suppl 4)2024 Aug 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39122445
ABSTRACT
Routine assessment of health facility capacity to provide abortion and post-abortion care can inform policy and programmes to expand access and improve quality. Since 2018, abortion and/or post-abortion care have been integrated into two WHO health facility assessment tools the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment and the Harmonised Health Facility Assessment. We discuss lessons learnt through experiences integrating abortion into these standardised tools. Our experiences highlight the feasibility of including abortion in health facility assessments across a range of legal contexts. Factors facilitating the integration of abortion include cross-country collaboration and experience sharing, timely inputs into tool adaptations, clear leadership, close relationships among key stakeholders as in assessment coordination groups, use of locally appropriate terminology to refer to abortion and reference to national policies and guidelines. To facilitate high-quality data collection, we identify considerations around question sequencing in tool design, appropriate terminology and the need to balance the normalisation of abortion with adequate sensitisation and education of data collectors. To facilitate appropriate and consistent analysis, future work must ensure adequate disaggregation of recommended and non-recommended abortion methods, alignment with national guidelines and development of a standardised approach for measuring abortion service readiness. Measurement of abortion service availability and readiness should be a routine practice and a standardised component of health facility assessment tools. Evidence generated by health facility assessments that include abortion monitoring can guide efforts to expand access to timely and effective care and help normalise abortion as a core component of sexual and reproductive healthcare.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: World Health Organization / Abortion, Induced / Health Services Accessibility Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: BMJ Glob Health Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: World Health Organization / Abortion, Induced / Health Services Accessibility Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: BMJ Glob Health Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: