Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Learning curve stratified outcomes after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: International multicenter experience.
Jones, Leia R; Zwart, Maurice J W; de Graaf, Nine; Wei, Kongyuan; Qu, Liu; Jiabin, Jin; Ningzhen, Fu; Wang, Shin-E; Kim, Hongbeom; Kauffmann, Emanuele F; de Wilde, Roeland F; Molenaar, I Quintus; Chao, Ying Jui; Moraldi, Luca; Saint-Marc, Olivier; Nickel, Felix; Peng, Cheng-Ming; Kang, Chang Moo; Machado, Marcel; Luyer, Misha D P; Lips, Daan J; Bonsing, Bert A; Hackert, Thilo; Shan, Yan-Shen; Groot Koerkamp, Bas; Shyr, Yi-Ming; Shen, Baiyong; Boggi, Ugo; Liu, Rong; Jang, Jin-Young; Besselink, Marc G; Abu Hilal, Mohammad.
Affiliation
  • Jones LR; Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Zwart MJW; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • de Graaf N; Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Wei K; Department of Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Qu L; Department of Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Jiabin J; Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China.
  • Ningzhen F; Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China.
  • Wang SE; Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
  • Kim H; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea.
  • Kauffmann EF; Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
  • de Wilde RF; Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Molenaar IQ; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Chao YJ; Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Moraldi L; Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
  • Saint-Marc O; Department of Surgery, Center Hospitalier Orleans, France.
  • Nickel F; Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Peng CM; Department of Surgery, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Kang CM; Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, Sinchon-dong, South Korea.
  • Machado M; Department of Surgery, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Luyer MDP; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Lips DJ; Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
  • Bonsing BA; Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
  • Hackert T; Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Shan YS; Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Groot Koerkamp B; Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Shyr YM; Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
  • Shen B; Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China.
  • Boggi U; Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
  • Liu R; Department of Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Jang JY; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea.
  • Besselink MG; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: m.g.besselink@amsterdamUMC.nl.
  • Abu Hilal M; Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS, United Kingdom. Electronic address: abuhilal9@gmail.com.
Surgery ; 2024 Aug 19.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39164152
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy is increasingly being implemented worldwide, with good results reported from individual expert centers. However, it is unclear to what extent outcomes will continue to improve during the learning curve, as large international studies are lacking.

METHODS:

An international retrospective multicenter case series, including consecutive patients after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy from 18 centers in 8 countries in Europe, Asia, and South America until December 31, 2019, was conducted. A cumulative sum analysis was performed to determine the inflection points for the feasibility (operative time and blood loss) and proficiency (postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C and major morbidity) learning curves. Outcomes were compared in 3 groups on the basis of the learning curve inflection points.

RESULTS:

Overall, 2,186 patients after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy were included. The feasibility learning curve was reached after 30-45 robotic pancreatoduodenectomy procedures and the proficiency learning curve after 90 robotic pancreatoduodenectomy procedures. These inflection points created 3 phases, which were associated with major morbidity (24.7%, 23.4%, and 12.3%, P < .001) but not 30-day mortality (2.1%, 2.0%, and 1.5%, P = .670). Other outcomes mostly continued to improve, including median operative time 432, 390, and 300 minutes (P < .0001), conversion 6.0%, 4.7%, and 2.7% (P = .002), bile leakage 7.2%, 4.1%, and 2.4% (P < .001), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage 6.5%, 6.1%, and 1.8% (n = 21) but not R0 resection (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma only) 78.5%, 73.9%, and 82.8% (P = .35), and 90-day mortality rate 3.1%, 3.5%, and 2.1% (P = .191). Centers performing >20 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies annually had lower rates of conversion, reoperation, and shorter median operative time as compared with centers performing 10-20 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies annually.

CONCLUSION:

This international multicenter study demonstrates that most outcomes of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy continued to improve during 3 learning curve phases without a negative effect on 90-day mortality. Randomized studies are needed in high-volume centers that have surpassed the first learning curves, to compare these outcomes with the open approach.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Surgery Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Surgery Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: