Neuroform EZ and Enterprise 2 stents in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a comparative study / 中华神经医学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore the stent apposition and safety of Neuroform EZ and Enterprise 2 stents in treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS), and their influencing factors for in-stent restenosis.Methods:A total of 143 sICAS patients treated by Enterprise 2 stents (implanted 143 Enterprise 2 stents, E2 group) and 202 patients treated by Neuroform EZ stents (implanted 202 Neuroform EZ stents, EZ group) were selected from Department of Interventional Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2017 to January 2022. Stent apposition was evaluated based on reconstructive images of high-resolution flat detector CT. The complications 30 d after surgery and during 6-24 months of follow-up were recorded. Based on DSA or CTA 6 months after surgery, the patency of the two stents was evaluated. Univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to determine the independent risk factors for in-stent restenosis.Results:(1) Forty-nine patients had incomplete stent apposition (ISA) after stent release: 24 patients with ISA in E2 group (16.8%, 24/143; 15 of type I and 9 of type II) and 25 with ISA in the EZ group (12.4%, 25/202, 11 of type I and 14 of type II) were found, without statistical difference ( χ 2=1.334, P=0.248); however, ISA incidence in the EZ group (19.0% and 10.3%) was significantly lower than that in the E2 group (41.4% and 25.6%) when the diameter ratio of anterior and posterior vessels of the stenosis lesions≥1.30 or the angle of stent≥75° ( χ 2=4.228, P=0.040; χ 2=4.531, P=0.033). (2) Within 30 d of stenting, 17 patients developed neurological dysfunction-related complications: 8 patients in EZ group and 9 in E2 group were noted, without significant difference ( P=0.324). Clinical follow-up was obtained in 317 patients, and 20 patients developed long-term stroke associated with responsible lesion vessels: 12 patients in EZ group and 8 in E2 group were noted, without significant difference ( P=0.995). (3) Totally, 298 patients received imaging follow-up 6 months after surgery, and 65 patients developed in-stent restenosis: 36 patients in EZ group and 29 in E2 group were noted, without significant difference ( χ 2=0.309, P=0.578). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes ( OR=2.714, 95% CI: 1.437-5.126, P=0.002), stent apposition ( OR=3.435, 95% CI: 1.223-9.652, P=0.019), lesion stenosis length ( OR=1.176, 95% CI: 1.065-1.300, P=0.001) and immediate postoperative residual stenosis ( OR=1.038, 95% CI: 1.004-1.074, P=0.029) were independent influencing factors for in-stent restenosis. Conclusions:Enterprise 2 and Neuroform EZ stents have high stent apposition and safety in sICAS treatment, but in cases with large diameter ratio of the anterior and posterior vessels of the stenosis lesions (diameter ratio≥1.30) or large angle of the stent (≥75°), Neuroform EZ stent has better stent apposition. Patients with diabetes, ISA, long lesion stenosis or high residual stenosis may trend to have in-stent restenosis.