Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Legislation in Hospital Dentistry: Gaps, Perspectives and Desires
Simões, Ana Clara Correa Duarte; Campos, Felipe Rodrigues de Oliveira; Câmara, João Victor Frazão; Probst, Livia Fernandes; Groisman, Sonia; Cedro, Vinicius Queiroz Miranda; Pereira, Antonio Carlos.
Affiliation
  • Simões, Ana Clara Correa Duarte; State University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Community Dentistry. Piracicaba. BR
  • Campos, Felipe Rodrigues de Oliveira; Court of Justice of the State of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro. BR
  • Câmara, João Victor Frazão; Saarland University. University Hospital. Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry. Homburg/Saar. DE
  • Probst, Livia Fernandes; State University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Community Dentistry. Piracicaba. BR
  • Groisman, Sonia; Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. School of Dentistry. Department of Community Dentistry. Rio de Janeiro. BR
  • Cedro, Vinicius Queiroz Miranda; State University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Community Dentistry. Piracicaba. BR
  • Pereira, Antonio Carlos; State University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Community Dentistry. Piracicaba. BR
Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr ; 24: e220153, 2024. tab, graf
Article in En | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1529138
Responsible library: BR1264.1
ABSTRACT
Abstract

Objective:

To analyze the existing state legislation, including not only the ordinary laws, but also their infralegal regulation and the state legislation on Hospital Dentistry. Material and

Methods:

A survey was carried out in the databases of the Legislative Assemblies of the Brazilian States and the Federal District, as well as the Regional and Federal Councils of Dentistry in Brazil. Subsequently, a survey was carried out in the databases of the Ministry of Health, State Dental Councils and Federal Dental Council in Brazil.

Results:

Only 8 Brazilian states have legislation in force regarding hospital dentistry, which represents 29.63% of the federative units. Among the Brazilian regions, the Midwest presented the highest prevalence of the laws found (37.50%), followed by the North (25%) and the other regions with the same coverage (12.50%). Also, an orientation and an ordinance from the Ministry of Health, six resolutions from the Federal Council of Dentistry, and a technical note from the National Health Surveillance Agency were found.

Conclusion:

Several States do not have rules on the subject, making it imperative to create a federal rule that not only imposes the presence of the dentist, but also regulates the proportion of the team, workload, and availability.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: BBO / LILACS Main subject: Oral Health / Dental Service, Hospital / Dental Staff, Hospital / Intensive Care Units Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brasil / Alemania Country of publication: Brasil

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: BBO / LILACS Main subject: Oral Health / Dental Service, Hospital / Dental Staff, Hospital / Intensive Care Units Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brasil / Alemania Country of publication: Brasil