Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of cancer-directed surgery on the prognosis of liver metastases from gastric cancer
Ji, Nan-Nan; Zeng, Yue-Can; Wu, Xiao-Wen; Cao, Qian; Li, Zhi-Hui; Liu, Rui; Tu, Wei.
Affiliation
  • Ji, Nan-Nan; Hainan Medical University. The Second Affiliated Hospital. Department of Radiation Oncology. Haikou. China
  • Zeng, Yue-Can; Hainan Medical University. The Second Affiliated Hospital. Department of Radiation Oncology. Haikou. China
  • Wu, Xiao-Wen; Hainan Medical University. The Second Affiliated Hospital. Department of Neurology. Haikou. China
  • Cao, Qian; The General Hospital of Western Theater Command. Department of Oncology. Sichuan. China
  • Li, Zhi-Hui; The General Hospital of Western Theater Command. Department of Oncology. Sichuan. China
  • Liu, Rui; Hainan Medical University. The Second Affiliated Hospital. Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases. Haikou. China
  • Tu, Wei; Hainan Medical University. The Second Affiliated Hospital. Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology. Haikou. China
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 26(3): 756-764, mar. 2024.
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-230805
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: ES15.1 - BNCS
ABSTRACT
There are controversial about the application of cancer-directed surgery (CDS) in patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer, with improved responses to chemotherapy and targeted treatments, the role of CDS in metastatic gastric cancer to the liver needs to be revisited. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of CDS on patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer. Data for patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer were extracted from the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A total of 958 individuals were enrolled, 285 in the CDS group and 673 in the non-cancer guided surgery (Non-CDS) group. Following propensity score matching (PSM) analysis at 1:1 in the two groups,285 were included in the survival analysis for each group. Kaplan–Meier values and Cox proportional risk models were used to estimate the effect of CDS on patients' prognoses. Compared with the Non-CDS group, the CDS group significantly prolonged the median overall survival from 4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3–5) to 11 months (95% CI 8–12), p value < 0.001. Overall survival (OS) at 1 year was higher in the CDS group than in the Non-CDS group, at 44% (95 CI 38–50) and 25% (95 CI 20–30), respectively. OS at 3 years was also higher in the CDS group than in the Non-CDS group, at 24% (95 CI 19–29) and 6% (95 CI 3–9), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that Non-CDS (hazard ratio[HR] = 2.26, 95% CI 1.88–2.72, p value < 0.001) was an adverse independent prognostic factor for patients (AU)
Subject(s)
Key words
Search on Google
Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Stomach Neoplasms / Liver Neoplasms Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Year: 2024 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Stomach Neoplasms / Liver Neoplasms Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Year: 2024 Document type: Article