Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dry versus conventional laser imagers: film properties and image quality.
Gahleitner, A; Kreuzer, S; Schick, S; Nowotny, R; Breitenseher, M; Solar, P; Czerny, C; Lang, T; Imhof, H.
Affiliation
  • Gahleitner A; Department of Radiology and MR, University of Vienna, University Hospital Vienna, Austria.
Radiology ; 210(3): 871-5, 1999 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10207495
ABSTRACT
The authors compared image quality and stability with a dry laser imager versus a conventional wet laser imager. Hard copies of 56 magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic studies were analyzed for gray-scale distribution and temperature stability. Results with the dry laser imager did not reach the quality of results with a wet laser imager, but the performance and ecologic criteria were sufficient to make use of this technique advantageous.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Printing / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Lasers Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Radiology Year: 1999 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Austria
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Printing / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Lasers Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Radiology Year: 1999 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Austria