Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Challenges faced in recruiting patients from primary care practices into a physical activity intervention trial. Activity Counseling Trial Research Group.
Margitic, S; Sevick, M A; Miller, M; Albright, C; Banton, J; Callahan, K; Garcia, M; Gibbons, L; Levine, B J; Anderson, R; Ettinger, W.
Affiliation
  • Margitic S; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, USA. smargiti@wfubmc.edu
Prev Med ; 29(4): 277-86, 1999 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10547053
BACKGROUND: Special challenges are encountered when clinical trial recruitment targets a physician practice-based population, as opposed to recruiting from the community. Since most published information about recruitment has focused on the latter group, summation of successful primary-care-based recruitment strategies could prove useful for future trials recruiting from this population. METHODS: The Activity Counseling Trial (ACT) is a multicenter, randomized clinical trial that evaluated approaches to primary care-based interventions to increase physical activity in sedentary adults 35-75 years of age. Fifty-four clinicians from eight practices recruited 874 participants from three U.S. sites. Recruitment challenges that related, in great part, to the primary care setting included: (1) focusing on patients from ACT physician practices who had regularly scheduled or intend-to-schedule appointments within the next year; (2) placing trial staff in the clinical offices for recruitment purposes; and (3) placing trial interventionists in the physicians' offices. Other challenges were related to recruitment of minorities and men. RESULTS: Patient mailing yielded 43.4% of all randomized participants, followed by office-based questionnaires (32.5%) and direct telephone contact (21.6%). Based on a retrospective cost-effective analysis (indirect costs excluded), the self-administered office-based questionnaire was the least costly strategy for one site ($14/randomized participant), followed by patient mailing at another site ($58). The direct telephone contact method utilized at one site serving primarily a minority population yielded a per randomized participant cost of $80. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment of clinical trial participants from practice-based populations requires modification of the strategies used to recruit from the community. Multiple strategies should be employed, followed closely for their respective yields, and adapted as needed.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telephone / Exercise / Correspondence as Topic / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Surveys and Questionnaires / Multicenter Studies as Topic / Patient Selection / Family Practice Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Prev Med Year: 1999 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telephone / Exercise / Correspondence as Topic / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Surveys and Questionnaires / Multicenter Studies as Topic / Patient Selection / Family Practice Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Prev Med Year: 1999 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos