Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost effectiveness of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Walters, D J; Solomkin, J S; Paladino, J A.
Affiliation
  • Walters DJ; Clinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 16(5 Pt 2): 551-61, 1999 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10662480
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the cost effectiveness of sequential intravenous (i.v.) to oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole (CIP/MTZ i.v./PO) with that of i.v. ciprofloxacin plus i.v. metronidazole (CIP/MTZ i.v.) and i.v. imipenem-cilastatin (IMI i.v.) in patients with intra-abdominal infections. DESIGN AND

PARTICIPANTS:

Patients enrolled in a double-blind randomised clinical trial were eligible for inclusion into this cost-effectiveness analysis. Decision analysis was used to characterise the economic outcomes between groups and provide a structure upon which to base the sensitivity analyses. 1996 cost values were used throughout.

SETTING:

The economic perspective of the analysis was that of a hospital provider. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND

RESULTS:

Among 446 economically evaluable patients, 176 could be switched from i.v. to oral administration. The 51 patients randomised to CIP/MTZ i.v./PO who received active oral therapy had a success rate of 98%, mean duration of therapy of 9.1 days and mean cost of $US7678. There were 125 patients randomized to either CIP/MTZ i.v. or IMI i.v. who received oral placebo while continuing on active i.v. antibacterials; their success rate was 94%, mean duration of therapy was 10.1 days and mean cost was $US8774 (p = 0.029 vs CIP/MTZ i.v./PO). Of the 270 patients who were unable to receive oral administration, 97 received IMI i.v. and had a success rate of 75%, mean duration of therapy of 13.8 days and a mean cost of $US12,418, and 173 received CIP/MTZ i.v. and had a success rate of 77%, mean duration of therapy of 13.4 days and mean cost of $US12,219 (p = 0.26 vs IMI i.v.).

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients able to receive oral therapy, sequential i.v. to oral treatment with ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole was cost effective compared with full i.v. courses of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole or imipenem-cilastatin. In patients unable to receive oral therapy, no difference in mean cost was found between i.v. imipenem-cilastatin or i.v. ciprofloxacin plus i.v. metronidazole.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Protease Inhibitors / Bacterial Infections / Cilastatin / Ciprofloxacin / Thienamycins / Imipenem / Metronidazole / Anti-Infective Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Journal subject: FARMACOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Year: 1999 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Protease Inhibitors / Bacterial Infections / Cilastatin / Ciprofloxacin / Thienamycins / Imipenem / Metronidazole / Anti-Infective Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Journal subject: FARMACOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Year: 1999 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos