Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Who contracts for primary care?
Lewis, R; Gillam, S; Gosden, T; Sheaff, R.
Affiliation
  • Lewis R; The King's Fund, London.
J Public Health Med ; 21(4): 367-71, 1999 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11469356
ABSTRACT
The implications of the 1997 NHS (Primary Care) Act have been largely overlooked in the rush to establish Primary Care Groups. Allowing health authorities to develop local contracts for primary care has far-reaching implications and is an important departure from the national system of negotiation that has characterized general practice to date. This paper describes a content analysis of a sample of Personal Medical Services (PMS) pilot contracts. In the first year little attention has been given to achieving cost savings or greater efficiency and few contracts promote clinical guidelines. The difficulties of specifying services sensitive to local health needs are highlighted and the national Statement of Fees and Allowances (the 'Red Book') may not be swiftly supplanted. However, the pilots have introduced innovations such as salaried general practitioners, nurse-led services and NHS trust-managed care. The development of local contracts provides a valuable learning experience for general practitioners and health authorities in advance of the establishment of Primary Care Trusts.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Primary Health Care / State Medicine / Contract Services Type of study: Guideline Aspects: Equity_inequality Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Public Health Med Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 1999 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Primary Health Care / State Medicine / Contract Services Type of study: Guideline Aspects: Equity_inequality Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Public Health Med Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 1999 Document type: Article