Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Carotid sinus nerve blockade during carotid surgery: a randomised controlled trial.
Fearn, S J; Mortimer, A J; Faragher, E B; McCollum, C N.
Affiliation
  • Fearn SJ; Department of Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe, UK.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 24(6): 480-4, 2002 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12443741
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

we investigated whether carotid sinus nerve infiltration with lignocaine reduced blood pressure lability during the first 24h following carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

DESIGN:

prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial. MATERIALS eighty patients undergoing CEA for significant symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery.

METHODS:

after initial dissection, 5 ml of 1% lignocaine or normal saline placebo according to randomisation was infiltrated around the carotid sinus nerve. Blood pressure was measured by intra-arterial cannula during surgery and for four hours afterwards every 15 min, then manually, hourly for 18 h.

RESULTS:

patients having excision of the carotid sinus nerve were grouped separately for

analysis:

29 patients had lignocaine, 33 placebo and 17 excision (one early death with incomplete data was excluded). Mean systolic, diastolic and pulse pressures did not differ significantly between the three groups before carotid sinus nerve infiltration. After infiltration, those patients who had carotid sinus nerve excision, had significantly higher systolic [mean (SD)=155 (16)mmHg] and diastolic [75 (9)mmHg] pressures than those receiving LA [systolic=136 (15)mmHg, diastolic=65 (10)mmHg] or placebo [systolic=136 (19)mmHg, diastolic=65 (9)mmHg], (p<0.005 ANOVA). Nerve excision also resulted in wider variability of blood pressure as defined by the mean of individual standard deviations (systolic=25 mmHg, diastolic=13 mmHg) compared to LA (systolic=19 mmHg, diastolic=12 mmHg) or placebo (systolic=18 mmHg, diastolic=10 mmHg) (p<0.05 ANOVA). Normotensive patients had significantly lower mean diastolic pressures (p<0.001 ANOVA) and variability (p<0.05) if they received lignocaine although this did not influence pulse pressure.

CONCLUSIONS:

lignocaine injection of the carotid sinus nerve has no benefit in those patients with existing treated hypertension and only marginal effects in normotensives. It is more important to preserve the carotid sinus nerve if possible.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Pressure / Carotid Artery, Internal / Carotid Sinus / Endarterectomy, Carotid / Carotid Stenosis / Anesthesia, Local / Anesthetics, Local / Lidocaine / Nerve Block Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA Year: 2002 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Pressure / Carotid Artery, Internal / Carotid Sinus / Endarterectomy, Carotid / Carotid Stenosis / Anesthesia, Local / Anesthetics, Local / Lidocaine / Nerve Block Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA Year: 2002 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido
...