[Genital infections in women, in community practice. Comparison of two studies, 1987 and 2002]. / Les infections génitales chez la femme en pratique de ville Enquêtes Aforcopi-BIO. Comparaison des résultats 1987 et 2002.

ABSTRACT

One thousand eight hundred and thirty-six clinical and biological cervico-vaginal flora samples from genital infections in women observed in community practice in 1987 were compared to 368 samples collected in 2001. The diagnosis of sexually transmitted infection (STI) was rarely made. Nonetheless, examining these samples made it possible either to prescribe a specific treatment for a confirmed infection (chlamydia, trichonomiasis, candidiasis, gonococci, vaginosis), or to modify a long-term treatment that was often ineffective and sometimes badly tolerated. Not all vulvar itching, associated or not with pelvic pain, is caused by mycosis. Treatment based on a syndromic approach was often ineffective, because clinical symptoms, whether isolated or associated, even when they were suggestive of an etiology, presented only a minor positive predictive value (the PPV for the association ichting + pelvic pain was only 10% for chlamydia, but 45% for candidiasis). The diagnosis of vaginosis, suggested for the past 10 years as an improvement in the diagnosis of vulvo-vaginitis, was made in only 13% of the cases. The only significant difference in our two studies was a lower number of cases of gonococci, chlamydiae, and ureaplasms in 2001, the settings having remained identical, except for a lower number of patients in 2001.