Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Famotidine for the prevention of peptic ulcers and oesophagitis in patients taking low-dose aspirin (FAMOUS): a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Taha, Ali S; McCloskey, Caroline; Prasad, Rakesh; Bezlyak, Vladimir.
Affiliation
  • Taha AS; Gastroenterology Unit, Crosshouse Hospital, University of Glasgow, Kilmarnock, UK. ali.taha1@btinternet.com
Lancet ; 374(9684): 119-25, 2009 Jul 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19577798
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There are few therapeutic options for the prevention of gastrointestinal mucosal damage caused by low-dose aspirin. We therefore investigated the efficacy of famotidine, a well-tolerated histamine H(2)-receptor antagonist, in the prevention of peptic ulcers and erosive oesophagitis in patients receiving low-dose aspirin for vascular protection.

METHODS:

Adult patients (aged >/=18 years) from the cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and diabetes clinics at Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, UK, were eligible for enrolment in this phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial if they were taking aspirin 75-325 mg per day with or without other cardioprotective drugs. Patients without ulcers or erosive oesophagitis on endoscopy at baseline were randomly assigned by computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive famotidine 20 mg twice daily (n=204) or placebo twice daily (n=200). Patients had a final endoscopic examination at 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the development of new ulcers in the stomach or duodenum or erosive oesophagitis at 12 weeks after randomisation. Analysis was by intention to treat, including all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug (famotidine or placebo). This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Clinical Trial, number ISRCTN96975557.

FINDINGS:

All randomised patients received at least one dose and were included in the ITT population. 82 patients (famotidine, n=33; placebo, n=49) did not have the final endoscopic examination and were assumed to have had normal findings; the main reason for participant withdrawal was refusal to continue. At 12 weeks, comparing patients assigned to famotidine with patients assigned to placebo, gastric ulcers had developed in seven (3.4%) of 204 patients compared with 30 (15.0%) of 200 patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.47; p=0.0002); duodenal ulcers had developed in one (0.5%) patient compared with 17 (8.5%; OR 0.05, 0.01-0.40; p=0.0045); and erosive oesophagitis in nine (4.4%) compared with 38 (19.0%; OR 0.20, 0.09-0.42; p<0.0001), respectively. There were fewer adverse events in the famotidine group than in the placebo group (nine vs 15); four patients in the placebo group were admitted to hospital with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The other most common adverse event was angina (famotidine, n=2; placebo, n=4).

INTERPRETATION:

Famotidine is effective in the prevention of gastric and duodenal ulcers, and erosive oesophagitis in patients taking low-dose aspirin. These findings widen the therapeutic options for the prevention of gastrointestinal damage in patients needing vascular protection.

FUNDING:

Merck Laboratories and Astellas Pharma.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Peptic Ulcer / Famotidine / Aspirin / Esophagitis / Fibrinolytic Agents / Anti-Ulcer Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Lancet Year: 2009 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Peptic Ulcer / Famotidine / Aspirin / Esophagitis / Fibrinolytic Agents / Anti-Ulcer Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Lancet Year: 2009 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Reino Unido