Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the activities assessment scale in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Barber, Matthew D; Kenton, Kim; Janz, Nancy K; Hsu, Yvonne; Dyer, Keisha Y; Greer, W Jerod; White, Amanda; Meikle, Susie; Ye, Wen.
Affiliation
  • Barber MD; Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. barberm2@ccf.org
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 18(4): 205-10, 2012.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22777368
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The Activities Assessment Scale (AAS) is a 13-item postoperative functional activity scale validated in men who underwent hernia surgery. We evaluated the psychometric characteristics of the AAS in women who underwent vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

METHODS:

Participants included 163 women with POP and SUI enrolled in a randomized trial comparing sacrospinous ligament fixation to uterosacral vault suspension with and without perioperative pelvic floor muscle training. Participants completed the AAS and SF-36 at baseline and 2 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Internal reliability of the AAS was evaluated using Cronbach α. Construct validity and responsiveness were examined in cross-sectional and longitudinal data using Pearson correlation coefficient and analysis of variance. The AAS is scored from zero to 100 (higher scores=better function).

RESULTS:

Mean (SD) baseline AAS score was 87 (17.3) (range, 25-100). Functional activity declined from baseline to 2 weeks postoperatively (mean change, -4.5; 95% confidence interval, -7.6 to -1.42) but improved above baseline at 6 months (mean change, +10.9; 95% confidence interval, 7.8-14.0). Internal reliability of the AAS was excellent (Cronbach α=0.93). Construct validity was demonstrated by a correlation of 0.59 to 0.60 between the AAS and SF-36 physical functioning scale (P<0.0001) and lower correlations between the AAS and other SF-36 scales. Patients who improved in physical functioning based on the SF-36 between 2 weeks and 6 months postoperatively showed an effect size of 0.86 for change in the AAS over the same period.

CONCLUSIONS:

The AAS is a valid, reliable, and responsive measure for evaluation of physical function in women after pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Health Status Indicators / Pelvic Organ Prolapse / Motor Activity Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Year: 2012 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Publication country: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Health Status Indicators / Pelvic Organ Prolapse / Motor Activity Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Year: 2012 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Publication country: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA