Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantifying Memory CD8 T Cells Reveals Regionalization of Immunosurveillance.
Steinert, Elizabeth M; Schenkel, Jason M; Fraser, Kathryn A; Beura, Lalit K; Manlove, Luke S; Igyártó, Botond Z; Southern, Peter J; Masopust, David.
Affiliation
  • Steinert EM; Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
  • Schenkel JM; Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
  • Fraser KA; Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
  • Beura LK; Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
  • Manlove LS; Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
  • Igyártó BZ; Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
  • Southern PJ; Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
  • Masopust D; Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address: masopust@umn.edu.
Cell ; 161(4): 737-49, 2015 May 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25957682
Memory CD8 T cells protect against intracellular pathogens by scanning host cell surfaces; thus, infection detection rates depend on memory cell number and distribution. Population analyses rely on cell isolation from whole organs, and interpretation is predicated on presumptions of near complete cell recovery. Paradigmatically, memory is parsed into central, effector, and resident subsets, ostensibly defined by immunosurveillance patterns but in practice identified by phenotypic markers. Because isolation methods ultimately inform models of memory T cell differentiation, protection, and vaccine translation, we tested their validity via parabiosis and quantitative immunofluorescence microscopy of a mouse memory CD8 T cell population. We report three major findings: lymphocyte isolation fails to recover most cells and biases against certain subsets, residents greatly outnumber recirculating cells within non-lymphoid tissues, and memory subset homing to inflammation does not conform to previously hypothesized migration patterns. These results indicate that most host cells are surveyed for reinfection by segregated residents rather than by recirculating cells that migrate throughout the blood and body.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Monitoring, Immunologic / T-Lymphocyte Subsets / Arenaviridae Infections / Immunologic Memory / Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Cell Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Monitoring, Immunologic / T-Lymphocyte Subsets / Arenaviridae Infections / Immunologic Memory / Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Cell Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos