Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of oral prophylaxis during and after intensity-modulated radiotherapy due to head and neck cancer--a retrospective study.
Bichsel, D; Lanfranchi, M; Attin, T; Grätz, K W; Stadlinger, B.
Affiliation
  • Bichsel D; Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. dominique.bichsel@zzm.uzh.ch.
  • Lanfranchi M; Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Attin T; Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Grätz KW; Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Stadlinger B; Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Clin Oral Investig ; 20(4): 721-6, 2016 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26250794
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the influence of a prophylaxis protocol of head and neck tumor (HNT) patients during and after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIAL AND

METHOD:

In this 5-year retrospective study (2009-2013), 70 (m 55, f 15; age range 28-8 years; median 58.7 years) out of 248 HNT patients of the Clinic of Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery at the University of Zurich, Switzerland, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Parameters of investigation were the salivary flow rates, possible dental foci and the dental status, oral side effects of radiotherapy, the prophylaxis protocol, and patient's compliance to this protocol. The following time points before during and after IMRT (6 weeks) were analyzed prior to IMRT, 2-4 weeks, 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after the onset of radiotherapy.

RESULT:

Unstimulated salivary flow rate, pH value of unstimulated salivary, and stimulated salivary flow rate showed a significant reduction over time (p < 0.001). One year after IMRT, both unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow showed a statistically significant lower salivary flow. The number of caries-affected sites per patient was significantly higher for patients with low compliance to the prophylaxis protocol (mean low compliance 1.36, high compliance 0.26). Almost 75% of the evaluated patients suffered immediate gustatory change, and 47.1% showed signs of radiostomatitis through IMRT.

CONCLUSIONS:

High compliance to the prophylaxis protocol during and after radiotherapy is a key factor for the reduction of radiation side effects on dental hard tissue. CLINICAL RELEVANCE High compliance to a monitored prophylaxis program is crucial for patients after head and neck surgery.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated / Head and Neck Neoplasms Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Suiza

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated / Head and Neck Neoplasms Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Suiza