Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
Jin, Byung-Soo; Kang, Seok-Hyun; Kim, Duk-Yoon; Oh, Hoon-Gyu; Kim, Chun-Il; Moon, Gi-Hak; Kwon, Tae-Gyun; Park, Jae-Shin.
Affiliation
  • Jin BS; Department of Urology, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • Kang SH; Department of Urology, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • Kim DY; Department of Urology, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • Oh HG; Department of Pathology, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • Kim CI; Department of Urology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • Moon GH; Department of Urology, Yeungnam University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • Kwon TG; Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • Park JS; Department of Urology, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Korean J Urol ; 56(9): 624-9, 2015 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26366274
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate prospectively the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in predicting Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance (T1/T2, biopsy Gleason score≤6, PSA≤10 ng/mL, and ≤2 positive biopsy cores). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Between January 2010 and November 2013, among patients who underwent greater than 10-core transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, 60 patients eligible for active surveillance underwent radical prostatectomy. By use of the modified Gleason criteria, the tumor grade of the surgical specimens was examined and compared with the biopsy results.

RESULTS:

Tumor upgrading occurred in 24 patients (40.0%). Extracapsular disease and positive surgical margins were found in 6 patients (10.0%) and 8 patients (17.30%), respectively. A statistically significant correlation between PSA density and postoperative upgrading was found (p=0.030); this was in contrast with the other studied parameters, which failed to reach significance, including PSA, prostate volume, number of biopsy cores, and number of positive cores. Tumor upgrading was also highly associated with extracapsular cancer extension (p=0.000). The estimated optimal cutoff value of PSA density was 0.13 ng/mL(2), obtained by receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve=0.66; p=0.020; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.78).

CONCLUSIONS:

PSA density is a strong predictor of Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance. Because tumor upgrading increases the potential for postoperative pathological adverse findings and prognosis, PSA density should be considered when treating and consulting patients eligible for active surveillance.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostate / Prostatic Neoplasms / Prostate-Specific Antigen / Watchful Waiting Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Korean J Urol Year: 2015 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostate / Prostatic Neoplasms / Prostate-Specific Antigen / Watchful Waiting Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Korean J Urol Year: 2015 Document type: Article